Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

Angus farm shop and steak barn applicant left to stew a little longer over Piperdam planning appeal bid

The steak barn and farm shop plan was knocked back by Angus councillors in December.
The steak barn and farm shop plan was knocked back by Angus councillors in December.

Developers behind a bid to site a farm shop and steak barn near the entrance to Piperdam in Angus must wait a while to be grilled by councillors on their plan.

Forest Energy Scotland lodged the bid for a woodland site beside the A923 Dundee to Coupar Angus road last June.

But their scheme for the farm shop, restaurant, biomass plant and a staff house was rejected by Angus Council planners at the end of last year.

The Mullin’s steak barn branded application drew almost 300 letters of representation – 101 objecting to the proposal but nearly twice as many in support.

A graphic of the planned development.

The applicants said they wanted to create the business to tap into the multi-million pound Angus food and drink sector, deliver new employment prospects and add to the offering for the Piperdam community built up around the luxury resort north of Dundee.

Their plans envisage a 140-seater restaurant with two additional bothy rooms and outside seating.]

A café with seating for 100 and farm shop offering local produce are also in the scheme.

Significant benefit

Angus Council’s own economic development unit backed the plan.

It said the development would create a “platform to highlight locally sourced produce in a sustainable way, which would both benefit the local area and support the wider economy.

“In addition, the staff accommodation and the provision of new jobs is a significant benefit to the local economy,” it said.

The proposed site sits to the north of Piperdam.

However, Scottish Forestry objected over the loss of woodland in an area covered by a legally binding restocking obligation.

Muirhead, Birkhill and Liff Community Council also raised concerns around issues including noise, traffic safety and drainage.

The main points of concern among individual objectors included fears over the impact on the Piperdam resort and a potential jobs displacement from there.

Others worry it could create a precedent for further development.

There were also concerns around the impact on wildlife including protected species including red squirrels, badgers and bats.

The flood of support included a potential tourism boost and a new addition to the local business offering.

A number of Dundonians said the good transport links to Piperdam would encourage them to visit and backers also cited healthy competition as a good thing.

But the proposal was knocked back at the end of December for breaching the local plan.

Poor design

Planners slated the design of the proposal as “poor” and said there was no justification for a staff house.

“Little attempt has been made to design the building in a manner that would allow it to make a positive contribution to the rural landscape,” said the planning decision.

“This application proposes development on land that is otherwise protected as open space by Angus local development plan policy.

“It would result in a development that would have an adverse impact on the setting and environment of Piperdam, and would give rise to adverse landscape and visual impact.

“No information has been submitted to demonstrate that the development would enhance or maintain the recreational and tourism potential of the golf course and associated facilities.

“The design quality of the proposal is poor…the proposal is contrary to the development plan and there are no material considerations that justify approval.”

The knockback led to the applicants appealing the refusal to Angus Council’s development management review committee.

They were due to consider the bid on Tuesday, but agreed a site visit was necessary to see for themselves the planned location.

It will go ahead in due course before coming back to the committee for consideration.