Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

Mixed reaction to long-awaited FIFE plan result

Mixed reaction to long-awaited FIFE plan result

A mixed reaction is anticipated from communities across Fife to modifications to the region’s local development plan.

The long awaited result of an examination of FIFEplan by Scottish Government reporters was published on Friday.

More than 4,000 representations were made by individuals, community groups, businesses, charities and public bodies from throughout the region to the proposed plan mapping out Fife’s development over the next 10 years.

Among the key outcomes were the scrapping of Pipeland as a potential site for the new Madras College and a change to the deadline for delivery of a Cupar relief road.

Once adopted, the revised FIFEplan will also pave the way for an additional 300 houses on top of the 26,000 already proposed.

Despite heavy calls from the construction industry for even more new homes to be permitted, reporters avoided making major change to housing numbers envisaged by Fife Council.

Councillor Lesley Laird, the council’s depute leader and executive spokesperson for economy and planning, said: “I am pleased that we have now received this report which has been long awaited by communities, investors, and the council alike.

“It is encouraging that the reporters’ recommendations seem to have been influenced by the active involvement of those who participated in the plan consultation and that communities have been listened to.

“Clearly, not everyone will see the outcome they wanted.

“In those communities where public opinion has sought the removal of sites and that has happened, people will be pleased.

“But in cases where the examination does not support comments into the plan, there will be a need to understand the implications of the reporters’ recommendations.”

The proposed FIFEplan was submitted for examination in August last year and the findings were originally anticipated in June.

Planning officers are considering the details of the 1,150 page report.

Modifications arising from it will be presented to the council’s executive committee in February when the local development plan will be presented for adoption.

The report is available to view online.