Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

Moves to protect landscapes from “ugly” hilltracks

Glen Clova's new hilltrack
Glen Clova's new hilltrack

Calls have been made for stronger laws to protect hillsides from vehicle tracks.

Nine Scottish environmental agencies have come together to argue for tougher regulations to prevent roads being built for uses such as grouse shooting and deer stalking without planning permission.

Currently, no planning permission is required if the tracks are for agricultural use but the campaign group has argued many are built for other uses.

Since 2014, landlowners must tell authorities before building agricultural and forestry tracks but full planning permission is not usually required.

Scottish Environment LINK’s Hilltracks sub-group has spent the last three years gathering evidence on the issue, which has now been published in a report titled Changing Tracks.

It calls for a change in planning law to see full planning permission required for hilltracks on land used for field sports.

Helen Todd, co-convener of LINK Hilltracks and Ramblers Scotland’s campaigns and policy manager, said: “This major new report makes a compelling case for removing permitted development rights for agricultural tracks – to improve local democracy and help safeguard our most precious landscapes for future generations.

“For too long, landowners have been able to expand tracks further and further into wild landscapes with limited oversight from the public or authorities.”


>> Keep up to date with the latest news with The Courier newsletter


The call comes as the Scottish Government considers a new planning bill. Green MSP Andy Wightman has proposed an amendment which would prevent vehicle tracks being built without planning permission on land used for field sports and also would require full permission for any tracks in national parks, sites of special scientific interest or historic battlefields.

Ms Todd added: “Right now we have a golden opportunity to tackle this damaging activity, with MSPs considering an amendment that would require full planning permission for any new tracks on land that’s used for field sports.

“We’re urgently calling on all lovers of Scotland’s outdoors to ask their MSPs to help change the law to protect our countryside from these ugly, damaging tracks.”

Scottish Environmental LINK’s Hilltracks group includes Ramblers Scotland, RSPB Scotland, National Trust for Scotland, Scottish Wild Land Group, Association for the Protection of Rural Scotland, Badenoch and Strathspey Conservation Group, Cairngorms Campaign, North East Mountain Trust, Scottish Campaign for National Parks and Scottish Wild Land Group.

The report suggests the changes only for upland tracks, as it found that although forestry track proposals would benefit from much closer scrutiny, there was not conclusive evidence to show that removing permitted development rights alone would be worthwhile.

A form to ask MSPs to support the bill can be found at

ramblers.org.uk/scotland

.