Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner.

Ewan Gurr: Smacking debate excluded the views of young people

Ewan Gurr: Smacking debate excluded the views of young people

One year ago, the Scottish Parliament voted by 84 votes to 29 to pass The Children (Equal Protection from Assault) Bill, making Scotland the first UK country to define it as a criminal offence for a parent to smack their child.

An advert released last week by the Scottish Government urges the public observing parents “physically punishing their child to call 999 to report a crime.”

Last May, Children’s Minister Maree Todd assured parliamentarians that “our intention is not to criminalise parents.”

The legislation will come into effect next month but, throughout the debate which surrounded the proposed Bill between 2017 and 2019, what astounded me most was the way in which the voices of young people and particularly those who would have had relatively recent experience of smacking were excluded.

In fact, I found it sinister that some of the very charities who often herald the amplification of children’s voices were those most opposed to their input on this particular topic of conversation.

Last week, I spoke to 19-year-old Lily Waiton from Tayport, who has relatively recent experience of smacking. She became linked to the smacking ban when accompanying her father, Dr Stuart Waiton, to parliamentary and public events where he spoke in opposition to it and pointed to his “violated” daughter.

Lily laughed when I reminded her of the hustings in Dundee where this also took place but she said: “He was right though, I am not the psychologically damaged person supporters (of the ban) wish I was.”

Lily just emerged into adulthood as the Bill was presented in 2017 and told me about her experiences.

She said: “I was only ever smacked a handful of times and I knew it was when I pushed the boundaries. It happened so infrequently I don’t think about it and certainly don’t carry any resentment or feel scarred because of it.”

Lily added: “I had a great childhood and know my parents raised me with much love and care and I honestly believe smacking helped me quickly determine between right and wrong.”

I asked Lily if she feels smacking would be appropriate were she to settle down and have a family one day.

She said: “I imagine the way I was brought up will influence the way I raise my own children.”

Lily offered a withering assessment when I asked about her perception of Scottish politics.

She said: “It is shocking how much politicians appear to push their own moral agenda.

“Their job is to represent those who elected them but it is as if they feel duty-bound to use the law to manipulate people’s behaviour.”

Since 2003, it has been unlawful to discipline a child in a manner that reddens the skin but from next month, if you are a parent who uses any physical discipline, you will be a criminal.

Lily said: “This what our politics has turned into – it is just mad.”

Already a subscriber? Sign in



This article originally appeared on the Evening Telegraph website. For more information, read about our new combined website.