Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

Post-9/11 climate of fear now too great: Professor Richard English

Post Thumbnail

The response to global terrorism has had a bigger impact on people’s lives than actual atrocities, according to a St Andrews University academic.

Terrorism expert Professor Richard English told delegates during a conference at the Royal Society in London that policies adopted by the US and Britain after 9/11 had affected communities more profoundly than the disaster itself.

He said: “Despite the awfulness of the attacks in 2001, arguably the main change has been that the USA and its allies engaged in policies which did change the world, far more than the terrorism itself would have done.

“In so far as things have changed, it is probably responses to terrorism, rather than 9/11 itself, which have really made the difference.”

Prof English, who is the incoming director of the Centre for the Study of Terrorism and Political Violence at St Andrews, said a “climate of fear” had followed 9/11.

He stressed it was important not to detract from the human tragedy caused by attacks, but said the level of fear that followed was disproportionate.

“In the wake of a terrorist atrocity, people tend to act in a emotionally driven way and become anxious and worried, meanwhile the government wants to show that it is in control,” he said.

“But many more people die in things that are never discussed on the news.”

Prof English also talked about the invasion of Afghanistan and Iraq by the US after Ground Zero.

“It didn’t herald a new era of mass casualty terrorism, or of catastrophic attacks on the West. Many of the things people think of as new, such as the Afghanistan and Iraq conflicts or religiously motivated terrorism, are arguably versions of a world which was very familiar before 9/11.”

He added that terrorist experts believed a primarily military response to terrorism could be counterproductive.

He said: “In 2011 we probably have a more realistic approach to what can be achieved in terms of containing terrorism rather than getting rid of it. Getting rid of terrorism isn’t a realistic aspiration.”

Prof English chaired the session, 9/11: How and Why Do Terrorist Campaigns End?

Ten years on from the atrocities of 9/11, key figures in the world of terrorism study gathered in London to examine the watershed moment in international relations, and look at the impact the event has had on society.

Speakers included academics and policymakers including Sir David Omand, who was intelligence and security coordinator for Tony Blair between 2002 and 2005.

The event was jointly organised by St Andrews University and the British Academy.

Photo by Flickr userhsivonen.