Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

Report reveals 90% of Arbroath area primary school buildings failed suitability review

Post Thumbnail

Almost every primary school building in the Arbroath area is unsuitable for purpose, a new report has revealed.

New figures to be considered by Angus Council’s education committee today have shown only Colliston Primary achieved the required minimum rating for suitability when surveyed as part of a review of the Arbroath schools estate.

The remaining nine schools were all given a poor (C) or bad (D) rating, including Timmergreens and Muirfield primaries, which were earmarked for closure by the previous Angus Alliance administration.

Arbirlot was listed as C for condition and D for suitability, failing to reach to required minimum standard of either satisfactory (B) or good (A), in either measure.

Using the same system, Carmyllie scored B and C; Colliston B and B; Hayshead B and C; Inverbrothock B and C; Ladyloan B and C; Muirfield C and C, St Thomas B and C, Timmergreens C and C and Warddykes C and C.

The former leader of Angus Council claimed the scathing school suitability ratings were not unexpected.

Brechin independent councillor Bob Myles, who led the failed Angus Alliance bid for an £8 million school in Arbroath, said it was well known the town’s schools were in desperate need of upgrading.

He added: ”We knew a long time ago that all of the schools needed work and they are not simply going to get better overnight or improve with time.

”We always knew we couldn’t refurbish all the schools in one go, but other areas have had their work done and Arbroath was next in line for development.

”The figures have now come back and proved exactly what we were saying all along, and it was obvious from day one that there was some political gerrymandering here.

”There were definitely some underhand dealings, which still may come out in the wash, and I know there is already somebody looking at making a public inquiry.”

Arbroath SNP councillor Ewan Smith, who led the campaign against the Alliance’s proposal to shut Muirfield and Timmergreens primaries in favour of a new build, is now vice-convener of the council’s education committee.

He said the fresh consultation process would take into account the views of parents from across the whole of Arbroath.

”As a parent I made my feelings pretty clear about the previous consultation process and I still hold those views,” he said. ”But as a councillor I have to take an unbiased view and have to wait on the progress of the consultation process.

”There is an opportunity to spend £10.6 million, which is clearly a substantial amount of money in the current climate, and that means it is even more important that the council does everything it can to ensure that money goes to the right place or places.

”The decision on what happens shouldn’t be taken in advance by a single group of people.”Options in front of councillorsCouncillors will discuss a range of options for the future of Arbroath’s schools, with a view to deciding the best use of an £11m funding pot.

The fresh look comes after the Alliance’s £8m “superschool” application for a new build to replace Muirfield and Timmergreens was consigned to the scrapheap.

Option one is to divide the money between the schools, taking into consideration school capacity, school roll or internal area.

However, the report to committee states such a move would not direct resources to the schools most in need of investment and could not be justified as a best value approach.

Option two is to use the funding for maintenance, repairs and necessary replacements to all schools in the area.

While council officers recognised “some merit” in that avenue, the report states it would direct resources towards non-essential work and may not improve the suitability ratings for the buildings.

Option three is to combine refurbishment and improvement with a programme of maintenance, repairs and replacement across the town’s school estate.

Although officers have recommended that option be carried forward, the report has reservations that such a development could be complex and lead to a design led by compromise.

The final option is to look at building a completely new school or schools, with any money left going towards upgrades and maintenance of the existing buildings.

A total of eight possible new-build projects have been set out, including a similar development to the Alliance proposal already rejected by the Scottish Government.

A new 540-pupil capacity school could be constructed in place of Muirfield and Timmergreens at a cost of about £7.7m, leaving about £3.5m for upgrades at other sites.

The second option is for a 540-capacity school to replace Ladyloan and Timmergreens, plus a 242-capacity school to replace Muirfield, at a combined cost of £11.7m – about £472,000 over budget.

Option three suggests building a 540-capacity school to replace Muirfield and Timmergreens, as well as an 85-capacity school to replace Arbirlot and Carmyllie, at a cost of £9.2m, leaving £2m for improvements.

A fourth option puts forward two 252-capacity new schools from permutations of Ladyloan, Muirfield and Timmergreens at £8.1m, with a saving of £2.5m.

Meanwhile, a fifth proposal would see a 252-capacity school at Timmergreens, plus a 375-capacity school at Warddykes costing £10.2m, with a saving of £350,000.

Options six and seven are for 484-capacity schools at Inverbrothock and Hayshead respectively at a cost of £6.9m and a saving of £3.7m for upgrades.

The final suggestion is for a 484-capacity Hayshead, plus a 135-capacity school at St Thomas, at a cost of £8.7m and a saving of £1.9m.The faults:Arbirlot needs: Electrical rewiring, new water pipes

Carmyllie needs: Painter and joiner repairs, upgraded windows

Colliston needs: upgraded lighting, new boilers

Hayshead needs: new boilers, new fire alarm

Inverbrothock needs: toliet extractor upgrade, new boilers

Ladyloan needs: upgraded emergency lights, new nursery floor coverings

Muirfield needs: upgraded toilets, new handrails

St Thomas RC needs: upgraded lighting, upgraded fire doors

Timmergreens needs: new switchgear, new cycle shed

Warddykes needs: new fire alarm system, new heating system