Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner.

Madras College campaigners win appeal to block new school at Pipeland

An artist's impression of the planned school at Pipeland.
An artist's impression of the planned school at Pipeland.

Campaigners have won a legal battle to force Fife Council to reconsider plans to build a new Madras College at Pipeland.

Three civil appeal judges upheld a challenge brought by St Andrews Environmental Protection Association over the local authority’s decision to approve in principle a site for a new school.

Lord Malcolm said the decision would be quashed as “unlawful” and the whole matter would be sent back for reconsideration.

The judge said: “When a council is both applicant and planning authority, it will not always be easy for planning officers, councillors and others to separate and safeguard its planning jurisdiction from its interest in the proposed development.”

Lord Malcolm, who heard the appeal with Lord Drummond Young and Lady Clark of Calton, said the planning authority had adopted “an erroneous approach”.

“Any councillor reading the report would reasonably assume that if there was to be a new school, it had to be at Pipeland,” he said.

“The planning authority was diverted from the planning judgement which it required to carry out if properly exercising its jurisdiction.”

“The full council was effectively told that it should ignore the issue as to whether the green belt could be protected by using an urban site, because the applicant had already considered the matter and its decision was determinative,” said Lord Malcolm.

He added: “Thus the councillors were put in the position that if they wanted a new Madras College, and that had been a pressing need for many years, they would have to sanction development at Pipeland.”

Lord Malcolm said: “We are not suggesting that any conscious decision was taken to give priority to the council’s decision as education authority to build at Pipeland; we merely wish to emphasise the importance of constant vigilance against the obvious risks inherent in a council adjudicating upon its own application.”

The campaign group had raised a judicial review of Fife Council’s decision to grant planning permission for building a new secondary school at the site of land to the north of Pipeland Farm, Largo Road, St Andrews.

The applicant was the local authority’s property services department acting on behalf of the council as education authority.

Lord Doherty initially rejected the challenge at the Court of Session in Edinburgh last year, but his decision was appealed.

Lord Malcolm said the council decision “gave the go ahead for a major development in the green belt and on prime agricultural land, and thus was contrary to the terms of the development plan.”

He said “The proposal to build at Pipeland has proved controversial and came after many years of local debate as to the best way forward in respect of the acknowledged need for new and better secondary school facilities in the area.”

In the appeal it was argued on behalf of the environmental protection group that a planning report and the planning authority had erred in treating an alternative at North Haugh/Station Park as “a split site” and that there had been a failure to carry out a proper planning balancing exercise before concluding that Pipeland was the only suitable site.See Saturday’s Courier for more on this story.

Already a subscriber? Sign in