Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

Residents looking for answers over Dunfermline flood prevention scheme hit by £5.6m overspend

Residents looking for answers over Dunfermline flood prevention scheme hit by £5.6m overspend

The beleaguered Dunfermline flood prevention scheme is coming under continued pressure, as timescales continue to slip with a continued escalation in costs.

A report sent to Fife Council’s environment, finance and corporate services scrutiny committee estimated that a further £5.6 million will now be required from the council’s capital contingency budget to complete the project.

But the council is confident the overspend can be clawed back.

Dunfermline Central SNP Councillor Neale Hanvey, who has been pursuing the matter both locally and though the scrutiny process, met senior council officers to discuss the many issues raised with him at a recent public meeting.

Mr Hanvey said: ”Unfortunately, there was a delay in meeting officers but I had a productive meeting with all senior officers responsible for the scheme.

”We spoke about the concerns people have about the impact the scheme is having on their daily lives.

”Following the public meeting, I was able to identify five key areas that people, quite rightly, want answers to.”

They include:The original purpose of the scheme in the first place Why has it been possible for the cost of the scheme to spiral so significantly? Why has it been possible for the scheme to take so much longer than was originally planned? Why has the engagement with the communities affected been so poor? What reparation or compensation will be provided for those whose lives and properties have been blighted by the scheme?The councillor said he was most frustrated by the lack of engagement with the community, which he feels is still not improving.

He said: ”When the most recent works started in Forth Street, I found out about it when a friend contacted me via Facebook to tell me his parking had been restricted without any notice.

”Since getting involved in this matter I agreed a weekly update on progress and problems but the road closure was not mentioned; the same happened when the works at Liggars Bridge were delayed.”

At his meeting with officers he again pressed for better public engagement and was reassured by Dr Bob McLellan that a public event would be scheduled for early in the New Year.

This is to be followed by a full report on the scheme to the scrutiny committee in February.

However, Mr Hanvey is determined to see the community get the answers they want from this process and called on officers to be as transparent as possible in their report.

”I accept there may be elements of our inquiry which are sensitive but there is a need to be as open and honest as possible and a bit of contrition would not go amiss.

”Being able to say sorry is often a good first step in moving things forward, however late in the day it is.”

Fife Council’s executive member for transportation and environment, Councillor Pat Callaghan, said: ”Council officers are doing their best to manage the challenging situation around the Dunfermline flood prevention scheme.

”We have instructed the contractor to keep the public better informed on planned works and provide improved notification of works that will impact local residents.

”We have had meetings with Mr Hanvey and he is aware there will be a public meeting held in the new year and that the project is the subject of an ongoing, detailed review.

”While the projected costs have increased, the service is taking steps to recover any costs that are not the responsibility of the council. It is anticipated that the overspend can be recovered in full.”

leclark@thecourier.co.uk