Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

Absent parents £47 million in arrears to Child Support Agency

Absent parents £47 million in arrears to Child Support Agency

Absent parents across Fife and Tayside owe an astonishing £47 million towards the upkeep of their children, The Courier can reveal.

The staggering amount is just a fraction of the £3.8 billion in arrears due by mums and dads in the UK and has led to the Child Support Agency (CSA) being branded a “total disaster” by a local charity.

Lone parent organisation Fife Gingerbread claimed children were being used as pawns and said the introduction of the Westminster Government’s new Child Maintenance Options could in fact make matters even worse.

Manager Rhona Cunningham said absent parents who shirk their responsibilities should face real consequences.

“Organisations like Fife Gingerbread should not be hearing about children going hungry while the absent parent does not contribute,” she said.

The CSA was launched in 1993 to calculate the amount of maintenance a non-resident parent was due and to collect and transfer the money to the parent living with the children.

As of 2012 some 1.2 million cases were in arrears and 750,000 people had never paid a penny.

The CSA is being replaced this year by the Child Maintenance Service (CMS), which will encourage splitting parents to reach their own agreement over financial support.

Failure to do so will see the parent left with care of the children charged a fee to use the service in order to pursue the absent partner.

Ms Cunningham claimed the new arrangement could result in further stress and hardship for the tens of thousands of lone parents across Courier Country the vast majority of whom are women.

She added that organisations such as Leven-based Gingerbread would also suffer as they struggled to cope with an increased demand for help and advice.

She called on the Government to invest the money collected through CMS fees in projects to help lone parents.

“Without question, it is becoming more and more acceptable in this country to shirk responsibility and, worryingly, children are often used as ammunition during a separation,” Ms Cunningham said.

“Too many absent parents are more than happy to walk away from their moral and legal responsibilities, both in terms of nurture and as provider.

“Every day we see lone parents struggle to cope both financially and emotionally, yet they are often a target for condemnation by some media outlets and painted as scroungers who are draining the state benefits system.

“One of the real problems for lone parents and their children who live in poverty is the non-payment of child maintenance.”

She added that urging separating parents to reach their own agreement was actually better than the existing system but many people would need help to do so.

“They are having to do this at a time in their lives when feelings and emotions are particularly raw,” she said.

“Parents need support to overcome this and realise that the benefits of both having ongoing relationships with their children is a healthy and beneficial situation.

“Organisations like ours are very thinly stretched reacting to the impact of welfare reform so we don’t have the capacity right now to take on this kind of work as well.

“My plea would be organisations like ours need funding in order to support parents to do this. The Government should help with this, rather than taking a slice of people’s child maintenance payments.”