Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

Developer ordered to restore demolished steading brick by brick

The steading that was demolished.
The steading that was demolished.

A 300-year-old farm steading will have to be rebuilt brick by brick after it was demolished without consent, sparking a “violent” backlash from locals.

Cocklaw Developments’ Ken Thomson was refused permission to tear down an old outbuilding at Boreland Farm, near Cleish, in Kinross-shire.

The Fife-based firm’s bid was rejected by councillors in 2007 and then again following an appeal to the Scottish Government.

But a meeting of Perth and Kinross Council’s development management committee heard that Mr Thomson reduced the building to rubble without authorisation, amid health and safety fears.

The developer was accused of “driving a coach and horses” through planning regulations.

Cocklaw Developments must now rebuild the steading exactly as it was, using the original stone. Councillors also agreed to grant consent for eight new homes at the site.

The committee heard that a report from 2009 said that the steading was capable of conversion. However, Cocklaw said the property’s condition quickly deteriorated after that.

The firm’s planning consultant, Joe Fitzpatrick, said Mr Thomson took the decision to carry out the demolition works himself.

“He was unaware of the severity of the consequences of his actions and for that he apologises,” Mr Fitzpatrick said.

Councillor Joe Giocopazzi, who gave up his seat at the committee to speak as a member of the community, said: “Clearly there has always been an intention to demolish this building.

“This steading disappeared one Saturday afternoon. It wasn’t a dismantling it was a demolition and it was a very quick one at that. My main concern was the community reaction.

“It was very swift and condemnatory and was actually almost violent. It was outrage, not only from the local community but also from the residents.”

The company secured planning consent in 2010 to convert the steading into three homes, rather than demolish it.

Mr Thomsom could not be reached for comment.