Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

New plan for major Perth development has ‘serious flaws’

New plan for major Perth development has ‘serious flaws’

Developers behind a controversial proposal for western Perth have claimed that Perth and Kinross Council’s housing plan has “serious flaws”.

The Courier can reveal that the Pilkington Trust has written to all Perth and Kinross councillors, including leader Ian Miller, to express its grievance at Almond Valley not being included in the proposed local development plan.

An appeal against a decision by the council to refuse the plan for the Almond Valley Village was knocked back by the Scottish Government’s directorate for planning and environmental appeals Reporter Katrina Rice in September.

The Almond Valley plan would have seen 1,500 homes, a primary school and leisure, retail and office facilities built on land next to Huntingtowerfield and Ruthvenfield.

Last night Alastair Wood, head of planning for Savills who sent the letters to councillors on behalf of the Pilkington Trust claimed the local authority’s current proposed housing plan, which will be discussed by the Scottish Government on February 11, has “serious flaws”.

He said: “The council’s housing plan does not allow for growth or investment and we are hopeful the Scottish Government reappraises the situation. In our opinion, this still leaves Perth without a viable strategy to generate much-needed jobs and investment and without a realistic chance of meeting its housing needs over the next 10 years.”

In the letters to Perth and Kinross councillors, he outlines the defects which he believes are in the plan:

l The 750 identified houses at Bertha Park require the compulsory purchase of land from St Johnstone FC, the Pilkington Trust and the Bob Reid Discretionary Trust.

l The cost of the road through to Bertha Park will be in addition to the circa £15 million cost of the new A85/A9 junction which is required prior to work starting on a new Sainsbury’s store in Crieff Road, Perth.

l The 500 houses at the northern end of the Perth west site will not be able to make a significant contribution towards the cost of the road.

l The long-term development of the whole of the Perth west site is reliant on a new road junction on the A9 at Broxden at a cost of around £25m.

l None of the strategic housing sites identified in the proposed plan have been properly assessed and only the Almond Valley site has been fully tested and found by the Reporter to be deliverable.

The letter states: “One option would be for the council to recommend to the Scottish Government that it should include the (Almond Valley) site and allow the Reporters to amend the plan at the examination in public (in May/June).

“The second option should have a plan which can encourage much-needed investment and new jobs in Perth.

“It is therefore important that the council takes ownership of this issue and approve a plan which is realistic, viable and deliverable and not leave matters to the Scottish Government to resolve.”

A spokesperson for Perth and Kinross Council said: “The Almond Valley proposal attracted 51 representations supporting the removal of the site from the plan, and five seeking its reinstatement in the plan.

“All these representations, together with the council’s response, will now be submitted to the Scottish Ministers, who will appoint an independent Reporter to consider this issue in due course.”