Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

John Leslie loses appeal over blocked phone-hacking damages claim

John Leslie.
John Leslie.

Former TV presenter John Leslie has lost his challenge against a High Court decision to block his second phone-hacking damages claim.

In April 2013, it was announced that Mr Leslie had accepted substantial damages, costs and an apology from News Group Newspapers (NGN), publisher of the now-defunct News of the World.

Last year, Mr Justice Mann agreed with NGN that the settlement encompassed all allegations of hacking by or on behalf of the publisher.

Mr Leslie had argued that it encompassed claims relating to a particular mobile phone targeted by hacker Glenn Mulcaire and his associates on behalf of the newspaper’s news desk.

His new action, which referred to two mobile phones and a “series of arrangements” for hacking, detailed the distress and damage he said he suffered and included a claim for more than £300,000 damages.

At Mr Leslie’s appeal against Mr Justice Mann’s ruling, his counsel, Augustus Ullstein QC, said he knew he had been hacked but the extent and consequences had not been discovered at the time he accepted a “relatively small sum” of £15,000.

Mr Leslie had to issue proceedings when he did because of time and costs constraints and he did not have the “evidential bricks” to build up a case.

But on Thursday, the Court of Appeal agreed with the High Court that the new claims fell within the scope of the compromise of the first action and could not be maintained in a second action.