Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

Is this the “socially just” Scotland on offer?

Is this the “socially just” Scotland on offer?

Sir, Justice secretary Kenny MacAskill proposes to use the SNP majority in the Scottish Parliament to abolish the ancient law requiring corroboration in a prosecution case. Only one out of 35 or so Scottish High Court judges supports his proposal, but apparently he considers the other 34 to be deluded.

Citing the single judge who supports his plan as being correct on this point, Mr MacAskill intends to proceed with the part of the bill providing for the removal of this fundamental protection of the citizen under Scottish law, thus ignoring the views of this learned body of opposition.

Does this mean, then, that he will now call for the resignations of the other judges who have (according to Mr MacAskill) got this major question so spectacularly wrong that their combined view is simply to be ignored?

Surely any judges who cannot get this basic issue correct should not be permitted to sit in judgement on the major matters of freedom and principle that come before our highest courts on a daily basis?

Alternatively, perhaps there is a single resignation which might better serve the long-term interests of the public? Is Mr MacAskill’s stance just another indicator of what will be the reality of an independent “socially just” Scotland?

Mona Clark. 9 Millbay Terrace, Dundee.

Saltire wasn’t political, it was just enthusiasm

Sir, I am astounded by the comments from Clark Cross in Tuesday’s letters column regarding Alex Salmond’s enthusiasm when Andy Murray won the men’s final at Wimbledon.

Many more people inside Centre Court and outside on the hill were also waving saltires and jumping up and down.

Were these also childish actions?

Andy had won, after all.

This had absolutely nothing to do with any political votes. Alex Salmond’s flag didn’t say “Vote Yes” or “Vote SNP” did it?

Had I been fortunate enough to have been at Wimbledon I too would have waved a saltire and showed how happy I was that Andy had won. That does not mean I will be a “yes” voter.

Would Clark Cross have made the same comment had the Earl of Strathearn waved the saltire and jumped up and down with enthusiasm like Alex Salmond did?

June Smith. 33 Kildrummy Road, Aberdeen.

Narrow-minded nationalism

Sir, After Andy Murray’s historic win at Wimbledon on Sunday, Alex Salmond whipped that saltire out of his pocket and unfurled it like a conjuror showing off his best trick in front of a credulous audience.

I wonder if, had Andy Murray not won the match, it would have stayed firmly lodged in his pocket, since, by keeping it hidden until that triumphant moment, he seemed to be suggesting that a Scottish identity is only seen as an advantage when you’ve won.

Presumably he would have been happy for Murray to be described as Britishif he’d lost, so remember this flag-waving gesture next September and know that if Scotland votes “yes” for independence this is thekind of narrow-minded nationalism that we will have to live with.

Carolyn Taylor, 16 Gagiebank, Wellbank, Broughty Ferry.

Understanding size of that debt

Sir, Like, I am sure, many members of the public, I struggle when economists and politicians casually start to talk in billions. Perhaps the following may help to put things in perspective.

A billion seconds ago it was 1959.

A billion minutes ago Jesus was still alive.

A billion hours ago we were in the Stone Age.

A billion days ago nobody walked on two feet.

However, the Westminster Government manages to spend (or misspend), a billion pounds every 13 hours!

This may explain why, on their predicted figures, in two years, the national debt will be £1.6 trillion pounds that is one thousand six hundred billion pounds surely impossible to repay?

When the new schools curriculum is instituted in England, let’s hope arithmetic finds a place on the agenda for Eton!

Joseph G Miller. 44 Gardeners Street, Dunfermline.

Muirfield critics ignoring facts

Sir, Critics of Muirfield ignore the fact that for well over a century women have been able to play golf every Tuesday and Thursday as visitors and every day as members’ guests. When this was instituted in 1891 it was an extraordinary concession at that time.

Augusta’s decision to admit Condoleezza Rice was the purest tokenism and described by one of its (male) members as “killing two stones with one bird”. But the overriding issue known to everyone who has a serious interest in golf is that the Open needs the iconic Muirfield links a lot more than Muirfield needs the Open.

Dr John Cameron. 10 Howard Place, St Andrews.