Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

Direct rule ‘only option to intervene if NI ministers failed to agree on Covid’

Sir Brandon Lewis leaving the Clayton Hotel in Belfast after giving evidence to the UK Covid-19 Inquiry hearing (Liam McBurney/PA)
Sir Brandon Lewis leaving the Clayton Hotel in Belfast after giving evidence to the UK Covid-19 Inquiry hearing (Liam McBurney/PA)

Former secretary of state Sir Brandon Lewis was advised in late 2020 that the reintroduction of direct rule in Northern Ireland was the “only option” to intervene if Stormont ministers could not agree over Covid measures.

The advice came during a tense period within the executive as ministers discussed whether to extend lockdown measures amid concerns over rising numbers of infections.

There was a series of executive meetings across four days in early November as ministers struggled to reach agreement.

Stormont Assembly
The chamber of the Northern Ireland Assembly in Parliament Buildings, Stormont (PA)

Amid this, Sir Brandon was advised his powers to intervene were limited and that direct rule was the only option.

Northern Ireland has not been governed by direct rule from London since 2007.

A briefing document was published on the UK Covid-19 Inquiry website on Thursday evening titled Legal Situation If NI Executive Cannot Decide On Replacement Regulations, dated November 11 2020.

It came during the second week of the inquiry’s three weeks of sittings in Belfast after Sir Brandon gave evidence during which he had concerns the recently re-established devolved government could collapse in autumn 2020.

The document said the circuit breaker regulations were due to expire on December 13, adding it was “unclear” if the executive “view this as a hard deadline”.

It advised that the UK Government’s powers to intervene on health policy that applies in Northern Ireland “are extremely limited”.

“The UK devolution settlement devolves power over health to the devolved institutions in Northern Ireland. The Secretary of State does not, therefore, have the power to intervene where he considers that an Executive decision, or failure to take a decision, carried negative consequences for Northern Ireland,” it read.

“All decisions to intervene, particularly where institutions continue to function would result in calls for the UK Government to intervene in other areas where there is stalemate in the institutions.

Sir Brandon Lewis leaving the Clayton Hotel in Belfast after giving evidence to the UK Covid-19 Inquiry
Sir Brandon Lewis leaving the Clayton Hotel in Belfast after giving evidence to the UK Covid-19 Inquiry (Liam McBurney/PA)

“Ordinarily, therefore, the only course open to the Government wishing to intervene would be through primary legislation to introduce direct rule.

“Direct rule in the past has given the Secretary of State power to do anything that a Northern Ireland minister could do, and so applies across all devolved policy areas.”

The briefing note went on to say it had previously been considered whether direct rule could be introduced in a specific and limited way in the context of a possible no-deal Brexit in the absence of an executive.

“A limited form of direct rule would be unprecedented and complex, and would carry risks that any limited power created might not be wide enough to achieve the necessary objectives.”

Meanwhile a WhatsApp message exchange published online by the inquiry on Thursday revealed criticism of then-taoiseach Leo Varadkar’s approach at the start of the pandemic by DUP ministers and advisers.

A series of messages between then-education minister Peter Weir, then-agriculture minister Edwin Poots and then-advisers Emma Little-Pengelly and Philip Weir were also among evidence to the Covid-19 Inquiry published on its website on Thursday evening.

The messages dated between March 14 2020 and November 11 2020.

Covid-19 pandemic inquiry
Former Stormont minister Edwin Poots (right) and solicitor John McBurney leaving the Clayton Hotel in Belfast after giving evidence at the UK Covid-19 Inquiry hearing on Thursday (Liam McBurney/PA)

In a message dated March 14 referring to a decision to close schools in Ireland and criticism of Sinn Fein for wanting to follow the lead of the Republic, Mr Poots said: “Leo ignored advice and done what he done to give justification for a grand coalition.”

Peter Weir responded: “Majority of Executive in a sensible place on this. Fundamentally public health and the saving of lives is the only consideration which is why the CMO (chief medical officer) is the critical person to follow rather than Dan from Derry ranting down the phone to their local SF (Sinn Fein) MLA. We need to be the grown ups in the room, and measured and reassuring is the right tone and policy.”

In a later message, Peter Weir described as a “spurious argument” that Northern Ireland should “automatically follow an all Ireland approach as per foot and mouth/bse”.

He added it is undermined “by the reality that livestock do not generally choose to go on skiing trips to northern Italy”.

Later in the document, there are exchanges around the impasse in the executive over extending restrictions in November 2020.

In messages dated November 11, Mr Poots said: “Shinners want us to crash Diane’s proposal and tomorrow pressuring us into backing down.”

He added: “Shouting at each other bit like a continuation of our meeting,” and later said: “We can’t back down, they are happy we do this they just want to damage us.”

Peter Weir responded: “The cheek of getting lectured by someone from the republican movement about the unacceptability of excess deaths.”