Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

Farmers flock to East Central roadshow on new CAP

Turbulent waters lie ahead for CAP reform as applied to Scotlands diverse landscape.
Turbulent waters lie ahead for CAP reform as applied to Scotlands diverse landscape.

There can be little doubt that the Scottish Government faces a Herculean task in implementing the new Common Agricultural Policy.

Jonnie Hall, policy director with NFU Scotland, told a 200-strong audience at an East Central roadshow in Perth that there were more than 500,000 land parcels on Scotland’s farms with the smallest not much larger than a tennis court, and one which is the same size as Clackmannanshire.

“The key message is that these fields all have to be allocated to the correct payment region. It is vital that farmers check the letter which was sent out recently by Scottish Government and respond immediately if there appears to be anything with which they disagree,” Mr Hall said.

With Region One (arable, temporary grass and permanent grass) likely to receive around 220 euros per hectare compared to Region Two (rough grazing in LFA categories B, C and D) worth 35 euros per hectare and Region Three (rough grazing in LFA category A) only receiving 10 euros/ha there was every incentive for producers to make sure their allocations were correct.

Mr Hall continued: “Everyone is bound to have plenty of questions, but in many cases these should be answered by farmers and crofters themselves. Have I checked the allocations? Do I understand the regulations?”

There can be no denying the thirst for knowledge. The Perth meeting saw the car park at the Huntingtower Hotel log-jammed well before the meeting started, with standing room only in the function room.

Although it was an East Central meeting, farmers and consultants from across the country had taken the opportunity to hear a full explanation of what lies ahead.

“I am not going to stand here and say this CAP is fantastic because it is not. And I cannot claim to bring absolute clarity because there is none,” Mr Hall said by way of introduction.

The allocation of land to the three payment regions was critical for individuals, but also the key to the actual payment rates.

The total fund available to the Basic Payment Scheme was now set at 587m euros for 2019, when full transition had been achieved, but the payments for each region would entirely depend on the area of each.

“We know the size of cake but not the size of the slices,” Mr Hall said.

The whole business of transition from the old Single Farm Payment to the new Basic Payment Scheme was extremely complex and causing farmers real concern.

“Everyone starts at a different place but ends up in 2019 at the same place,” observed Mr Hall.

For those with high-value entitlements the drop in payments would be quite steep between 2014 and 2015, partly because of the smaller budget.

Then for the next five years the payments would decrease in equal steps until the regional standard payment is reached.

Conversely those on low payments would see their value increasing in gradual steps.

“There was an argument that the change should have been one-off and sudden, but it could have left established businesses looking over a cliff face.

“This way they may well be bruised, but they should survive,” he said.

However, there was still a lack of clarity about the number of entitlements allocated to each business at the outset.

NFU Scotland had argued that they should be based on either the 2013 or 2015 claim, with whichever was the smaller area winning through.

This so-called “double-gate entry” was proposed as a deterrent to stop landowners maximising their claim at the expense of tenants by not, for instance, entering into grazing lets.

This looks unlikely to be accepted by the European Commission on the grounds that it discriminates against businesses which have genuinely expanded over the period.

“It looks increasingly likely the eligible area claimed in 2015 will be the starting point,” said Mr Hall.

In the meantime new entrants and other “disadvantaged groups” would need to apply to the newly set up National Reserve for entitlements.

The number of people who see themselves as “disadvantaged” could be large and would include new entrants since last year, existing farmers with no SFP entitlement, and existing farmers who had started in business with no entitlements but had then purchased some.

As Mr Hall pointed out: “This always looked difficult.

“There is less money, the rules are complex and sometimes absurd and they have to fit Scotland’s hugely diverse landscape.

“The new CAP will be imperfect for all, but we must piece it together.”