Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

Review: Brink (Xbox 360)

Post Thumbnail

Brink’s team emphasis, crisp visuals and customisation do enough to stand out from a growing pack, in which reliance on online play can make or break the audience.

The physicality of the characters varies with class and build, and I’d place Brink’s feel somewhere in the Gears of War area. Weapons are beautifully designed and the character animations are lovely, with sheen reminiscent of Mirror’s Edge. There is a much-heralded “parkour” aspect to both games, but Brink’s SMART usage is more of a player delimiting factor than an essential game component. Impacts are quite well handled bar the gun butt, which has far too much stopping power for the animation it is paired to.

Levels reflect the run-down, Brazilian favela-like homes of the resistance, while the establishment’s complexes are pristine and hi-tech. While each map presents a “historical” set of conditions those needed for victory, who has the high ground or initial advantage, etc. each team has its own challenges per objective and reasoning behind its aims.

A side’s moral judgements are hinted at (the same package is termed a bioweapon or research, or an escaping terrorist is an imprisoned pilot) but not overly laboured. Brink gives the player just enough flavour to know why something is important, without any hectoring, and this is one of its redeeming qualities.

Much has been made of the amount of customisation Brink caters for. Good performance in offline and online modes grants experience points, used to level the character and increase its proficiency in certain tasks. There is also an array of hairstyles, hats, bandoliers, trousers and weapon modifications. I haven’t seen such a level of customisation since the ill-fated Realtime Worlds title APB (which will see its open beta re-launch as APB: Reloaded on May 18) and the scope for creating unique characters is very exciting for gaming’s future.

Gun modifications are not automatic choices, as each tends to have a mixed impact on a weapon’s performance. I think the mods have been added to vary the player’s experience as the guns are on the vanilla side. Varieties are distinguishable by their rate of fire, sound and stopping power, but models of gun within their types are too similar, and I find them impossible to distinguish without adding different modifications for a visual cue.

Brink’s team emphasis, crisp visuals and customisation stand out in a small pack where a reliance on online play can boost sales or diminish market share considerably. For every Call of Duty there is a Quake Wars, and I’d consider Brink to shine more than enough to be considered the reverse of Shadowrun’s coin.

On a dystopian planet, rising seas have forced humanity to huddle together in a floating city, Ark. It turns out the inequalities of the present continue in the future, as years of plenty give way to division along resource and privilege lines. Some decide to leave Ark via plane, in search of others. These refugees feel oppressed by the city’s founders, who squabble among themselves and retain a disproportionate share of the city’s food and water. Their security forces are buoyed by a sense of righteousness, with more than a hint of misunderstanding.

On digesting a few plot points, the player raises an old question:Am I red, or blue?Developer Splash Damage lets the player decide Ark’s fate by choosing to aid Resistance or Security efforts. Rather than have you choose the answer to a moral question good or bad? the choice is mostly aesthetic. Tattoos or crew cuts, baggies or fatigues.

A tactical shooter at heart, Brink’s games are never won on the merits of holding one type of weapon or an individual’s skill. Character classes are familiar (soldier, engineer, operative, medic) in the Team Fortress mould, although their application in Brink is more mechanical and not so much down to personal preference.

Each side’s success in a map is based on at least two objectives, which all require varying character classes to complete. This said, a team’s decision to go all out on medics to escort a wounded man is always fatal. As the demands of an objective are fluid and class choice depends on the rest of the team, change is made instantly at easily reached workstations. Each class is capable of “buffing” its team’s abilities by gifting ammunition, medical help, and increasing another’s damage. The impact this has on play is enough to encourage communication in itself.

Tactical shooters are based on the spawn, by which the player is forced to wait until dying to pick the right class for a new objective, but Brink’s quick choices are a good fit because an experienced player becomes very hard to kill. Command wheels allow access to objective information, and one glance allows the player to know what team-mates are doing.

During play, my first comparisons were not with Team Fortress 2 but with Shadowrun, a very competent shooter that suffered from the questionable adaptation of a cult role-playing game to an FPS. The ability system and emphasis on teamwork rings a few bells, as does the ability to change body weight to allow different approaches to the game. Substitute a lithe and agile scout for an elf and we have a dynamic unfortunately missed by most, as Shadowrun went to the bargain bin.Swell mapsGripes that the game ships with too few maps seem unwarranted, as the majority (around seven of the 10) are very well balanced. Halo: Reach only came with five maps which anyone would willingly play online, and that game’s experience was much shallower. I’d recommend playing online, bar a few tutorial sessions to get to grips with Brink’s concepts. While the AI is reasonable, there are occasions where its herding tendency makes it impossible to play a map in the way it seems intended: choke points work all too well and the player is often forced to abandon his game-controlled colleagues and find a back way around to complete an objective.

Splash Damage introduces a SMART (Smooth Movement Across Random Terrain) system, which adds a simple third dimension to shooters. Vaulting desks, pulling up on to higher levels, and sliding into cover are possible with a button press. The results are sometimes unrealistic but I appreciate the effort to introduce some kind of movement beyond a short, grunting jump.