Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

Financial and environmental benefits from cutting diseases

Researchers identified 12 livestock diseases which contribute to greenhouse gas emissions
Researchers identified 12 livestock diseases which contribute to greenhouse gas emissions

A win-win approach to reducing animal disease, cutting greenhouse gas emissions and boosting farm profits is being investigated by scientists and Scottish Government policy teams.

Grazing ruminants like cattle and sheep are known to be responsible for 50% of the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions associated with agriculture, and livestock researchers at Edinburgh’s Moredun Institute have identified 12 common diseases which exacerbate these emissions.

Senior researcher Dr Philip Skuce said that if something ‘meaningful’ was done to reduce endemic diseases such as Johnes, Leptospirosis, Sheep Scab, Fluke, Toxoplasmosis and IBR there was an opportunity to reduce emissions without compromising farm profitability.

Initially Government, the Moredun and farming industry stakeholders considered selecting one disease to eradicate but that was considered to be too difficult. Instead it was decided more could be achieved through an accumulation of ‘marginal gains’ by encouraging farmers to investigate health issues on their own farms and then reduce them through better diagnosis, monitoring and biosecurity.

“Every farm has something and it’s not always the same thing or same part of the country, and that reflects the nature of these diseases,” said Dr Skuce.

“Discussions are still ongoing with policy teams and stakeholders, looking at how it can be made to work in practice.  Animal health schemes could be incentivised by the Scottish Government, but it’s about encouraging farmers, and making it in farmers best interests.

“The idea is to identify the win-wins. We could  reduce disease on farms, reduce environmental impact but also promote sustainability and  the economics of livestock farming, which is marginal at best.”

Dr Skuce said top performing farms were already implementing best practice but the middle 20% of producers could improve significantly. He added that the bottom quarter couldn’t be persuaded to move forward.

Moredun chief executive Professor Julie Fitzpatrick said the Scottish Government was leading the way on the issue.

“In general most of the focus of the UK has been on exotic disease control, whereas the Scottish Government has invested in endemic disease control,” she said.

“Exotic diseases are an immediate risk to a country so you can see why it’s done, but if we’re going to end up with  high-welfare, high-production, low -environmental impacts through farming, we have to invest in future technologies.”

Moredun chairman, Crieff farmer Ian Duncan Miller said that falling subsidies meant he was looking for other tools that could increase his output and he was attracted by the prospect of improved disease control.

He added: “If I can increase my lamb survival from 85%-95% for instance, I’m going to do it because that makes money for me.”

nnicolson@thecourier.co.uk