Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

‘Government officials not permitted to support work to maintain suckler cow numbers’

Debate over cow numbers in relation to reducing emissions raged at the conference.
Debate over cow numbers in relation to reducing emissions raged at the conference.

Government officials were not permitted to support a document calling for actions to retain suckler cow numbers in Scotland, a leading civil servant has revealed.

The Scottish Government’s director of agriculture and rural economy, George Burgess, made the comments at ANM Group’s Beyond 150 conference at the Thainstone Centre, near Inverurie.

He told the audience of farmers and industry officials that he had not permitted his colleagues to sign their signatures on the recently launched Scottish Beef Sector Strategy 2030.

“I didn’t sign off on this because there was a bit [in the strategy] that said I will maintain the number of suckler cows,” said Mr Burgess.

“That is what lay behind my Scottish Government colleagues’ names not appearing on the report.”

Conference speakers from the left – Jim Walker, Steven Thomson, event chairman Eddie Gillanders, and George Burgess. Picture by Kenny Elrick.

The strategy – which was launched at the Royal Highland Show and developed by a steering group of beef industry representatives – included an aspiration to work to maintain suckler cow numbers at the 2021 level of 413,000 as per the June agricultural census.

Mr Burgess said the Scottish Government was fully supportive of beef farmers boosting their productivity, but with a focus on outputs rather than inputs.

The debate over cow numbers dominated much of the discussions at Thainstone with former NFU Scotland president and Dumfries farmer Jim Walker accusing Scottish Government officials of wanting to cull 300,000 beef animals in Scotland to reduce emissions from the sector.

Mr Walker, who was involved in the Scottish Government’s farmer-led group tasked with recommending ways the beef sector could reduce its environmental impact, first made the accusations last year.

They were denied by the Scottish Government at the time and Mr Burgess refuted them again.

However, Mr Walker told Mr Burgess: “The good news is that the economics of beef production in Scotland are such that you are going to get that [a reduction in cow numbers].”

Meanwhile Steven Thomson, senior agricultural economist at Scotland’s Rural College, shared details from Government colleagues on the framework that will shape future agricultural policy in Scotland.

Future farm policy will be based around a framework with three payment tiers.

He said payments will focus on three tiers – base payments to support active farming and food producers; enhanced payments for businesses that are highly effective in reducing greenhouse gas emissions and nature restoration; and elective payments for targeted nature restoration and supply chain support.

Mr Thomson said: “Farmers should not be just paid to change; farmers should be rewarded for achieving outcomes.”

The conference also featured an online presentation from Professor Jude Capper from Harper Adams University in Shropshire.

Dr Capper said a key challenge for the livestock industry would be tackling “consumer guilt” over eating meat and dairy products, and farmers needed to be able to demonstrate how they are working to reduce the environmental impact of their businesses.

She said: “Everybody needs to start thinking about their carbon footprint right now.

“You need to put the line in the sand now to be able to benchmark it because otherwise all the improvements that everyone is doing now won’t be recognised.”

A policy paper will be developed by ANM Group following the discussions at the conference, and then distributed to politicians and policymakers.

Conversation