Controversial plans proposed by a supermarket giant have been rejected to protect Broughty Ferry traders.
Councillors last night threw out the changes proposed by Sainsbury’s to sell more household products, arguing it could damage the Ferry’s shopping centre.
The supermarket chain had hoped to expand the shop space dedicated to non-food products by 10% a move supported by city planners.
The retailer argued that Broughty Ferry’s shopping centre was remarkably viable and that their store was suffering as a result of not having the same sales ratios as other big Dundee stores.
Councillors, however, led by Ferry member Derek Scott, voted down the plans in a ballot that went to the wire.
He said: “The slightest change to an independent retailer’s sales can have a very detrimental impact on their ability to survive.
“It is not worth taking the chance and it is not for us to establish a level playing field for big business.
“When they took on this store, they were aware of their obligations at this site.
“There is nothing to suggest that Sainsbury’s’ own viability is under threat.
“Broughty Ferry’s commercial centre is an important part of Dundee that should not be put at risk,” he added.
Mr Scott garnered cross-party support to reject the proposed changes, with SNP administration leader Ken Guild and Labour member Laurie Bidwell joining him in speaking against the plans.
Mr Guild, who also represents Broughty Ferry, said: “I do not see how these plans will improve the viability of the area’s shopping aznd I do not want to see the Ferry’s shopping centre going the way of the national average (and seeing more vacant premises).
“I want to continue to see it succeed. There are lots of independent shops that sell the kind of goods that Sainsbury’s will be selling more of. This move would infringe on the viability of those shops.”
Other councillors hit back in support of the move, with SNP councillor Ken Lynn disputing that the Sainsbury’s store on Tom Johnston Road was even in the Ferry.
A narrow vote eventually saw the plans rejected, with 11 voting in favour of approving the plans and 13 against.