Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

D-Day approaches for controversial Clatto Hill windfarm plans

Post Thumbnail

Two of Fife’s most controversial windfarm proposals could be given the go-ahead on Tuesday.

Fife Council’s planning committee has been given recommendations to approve a total of eight turbines at Clatto Hill.

There are two separate proposals for the site one lodged by West Coast Energy for five turbines at Devon Wood and another by Douglas Rennie for three at an adjacent site at Clatto Farm.

The proposals have met a tide of local opposition and little in the way of support from councillors.

They were discussed at north east Fife and Levenmouth area committees, with just two councillors backing the plans.

Among the objectors is Clatto Land Protection Group, which has taken its campaign to the Scottish Government in a letter to energy, enterprise and tourism minister Fergus Ewing MSP.

In the letter, seen by The Courier, members challenge remarks made by the minister that all applications are considered on their own merits.

Group chairman Greg Brown wrote: ”Our purpose in writing now is to highlight that our own experience as a community living on or around Clatto Hill in East Fife is profoundly at odds with that.

”What we know to have happened, which also helps explain the inadequacies of the planning service reports, is that the case officer assessing the applications concluded that both should be refused.

”His reports were removed from council committee agendas and he was told to get the recommendations changed to approval.

”It is no surprise that at two area committees of the council meeting last month, councillors saw through the reports straight away. In each of the two committees only one councillor supported approval recommendations.

”In Fife, planning chiefs seem to be running an unwritten policy different from the published ones.

”We don’t know what weight to give this, but there are views around saying that Scottish Government civil servants have been putting pressure on senior planning officials at Fife Council for more windfarm approvals. Our experience has been disillusioning, to say the least. The contrast between the face of public policy on onshore wind with the reality of its implementation was quite a shock.

”The huge rewards available to landowners and developers accruing when planning permission is given to onshore wind projects has led to a great number of speculative applications in Fife.

”Pressure seems to be on planning officials to have a permissive attitude to them wholly outwith the parameters of the policies they are supposed to follow.”

A Scottish Government spokeswoman said: ”We will respond to this letter in due course. Although we are unable to comment on live planning applications, planning authorities and where appropriate the Scottish Government will only allow windfarms to be built where the impacts have been found to be acceptable and unsuitable applications are rejected.

”Every application for windfarm development is assessed against development plan policy and on its merits, taking into account the views of statutory consultees, interested parties, local communities and the public.

”Scottish planning policy and advice makes it clear that developments must always be very carefully sited to ensure that unacceptable impacts on the environment or local amenity are avoided or mitigated.”