Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

Campaigners ‘delighted’ to hear Scottish Government won’t delay new Madras College at Pipeland

The news is a huge boost for those who have fought a long-running campaign for a new school.
The news is a huge boost for those who have fought a long-running campaign for a new school.

Parent campaigners are celebrating after the Scottish Government opened the way to a new single-site Madras College at Pipeland in St Andrews.

Officials have confirmed Fife Council’s decision to build the school will not be “called-in” for consideration by its planners, even though it will be on greenbelt land and depart from the local development plan.

They ruled the “wider community benefits outweigh the divergence from the development plan in this case” and stated that the council has given “sound reasons” for arriving at its decision.

The planning application in principle was approved by the full Fife Council on April 3, delighting pro-Pipeland campaigners who have been pushing for a replacement for the dilapidated split-site facilities at Kilrymont and South Street.

However, Pipeland objectors expressed deep disappointment that the Government will not get involved.

They fear the development will destroy the nationally-important landscape character of St Andrews and set a precedent for further development in the area.

Objectors also believe more effort should be made to push for a ruled-out site on the western edge of town.

Chris Wallard, a spokesman for pro-Pipeland campaign group Parent Voice, welcomed the Scottish Government’s announcement, which paves the way for Fife Council to press on and lodge a full planning application for the Pipeland site.

He told The Courier: “We are delighted to hear that the Scottish Government has decided not to call-in this decision, and our many hundreds of supporters will be too.

“The full council has overwhelmingly endorsed a new Madras at Pipeland, and the Scottish Government has decided they have no objection.

“As we have always said, it’s the only available option, and at every stage common sense has prevailed, after a full and open debate.

“The democratic process has reached a resounding verdict over the principle of building a new school and we’re hugely grateful to the government ministers and council members who have worked hard to get to this point.

“This is another important step towards a desperately needed new school. The time for argument is over we hope the community will now come together to help create final plans for a school we can all be proud of.

“We look forward to a full planning application being submitted as soon as possible.”

Fife Council leader Councillor David Ross said: “I welcome today’s announcement that the planning application for a new secondary school on the Pipelands Farm site won’t be called in by the Scottish Government.

“This administration has always been committed to building a much needed replacement for Madras College and today’s announcement brings that a step closer.

“I know this has been a controversial issue but no-one disputes the need for a new school and this clears the way to let us concentrate on delivering that new school.”

St Andrews Labour Fife councillor Brian Thomson, said: “The confirmation received from the Scottish Government that the planning application for a new Madras College has been cleared back to Fife Council, for its own determination, is fantastic news for the children and young people of St Andrews and the wider Madras College catchment area.

“Local children, teachers, other staff and users of the community use centre have had to put up with sub-standard accommodation for far too long, and this news is a significant step towards the delivery of a much needed new school.

“I fully appreciate that there will be some in the St Andrews community who will be disappointed with the Scottish Government’s decision. However, the planning application to establish the principle of developing a new Madras College at the Pipeland site has now been through a fully democratic process, and I hope that the outcome is respected.

“The proposed new school will now be the subject of a detailed planning application, which will be considered by councillors in due course.”

Scottish Directorate for Local Government and Communities Planning and Architecture official, Iain McLeod, confirmed the news in a letter to Fife Council.

He said: “It is not the Scottish Ministers’ intention to intervene in this application by either issuing a direction restricting the granting of planning permission or by calling in the application for their own determination.

“Accordingly, (the) council are hereby authorised to deal with the application in the manner it thinks fit.”

In its conclusion, the Scottish Government said “reasoned justification” had been provided by the council for the approval of the planning application at this location.

It concluded: “On balance the council considers the development is acceptable, noting that the wider community benefits outweigh the divergence from the development plan in this case.

“The council has given sound reasons for arriving at its decision. It does not appear that a conflict of interest has influenced the council’s decision-making, and it has taken account of the issues raised. There is no reason to believe the council has acted inappropriately.

“The impacts are local to the St Andrews area of Fife and do not appear to raise issues of national importance that would merit intervention by Scottish Ministers.”