Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

‘Disaster day’ for campaigners trying to save Pitlochry’s Bank House from demolition

Post Thumbnail

Pitlochry people hoping to save a landmark in their town centre have suffered a mortal blow to their plans.

Protesters against the demolition of Bank House to make way for a budget hotel and supermarket had hoped that Historic Scotland would step in and overturn September’s council decision allowing the scheme to proceed.

But after months of consideration, the heritage watchdog has confirmed that it will not “call in” the application for Scottish ministers to determine.

James Tyrrell, the chairman of the Pitlochry Conservation Society (PCS), said: “It is truly a disaster day for Pitlochry, and for local democracy.”

Michael Scott, of Historic Scotland, said in a letter to Perth and Kinross Council planners: “Given the significance of Bank House as a building of merit in your council’s conservation area appraisal, we are disappointed that no positive attempt appears to have been made to retain and reuse this particular building.”

However, he goes on: “The site is a significant one, being located within the centre of Pitlochry. It is currently in poor condition and its regeneration is supported.

“We note the robust design process that has resulted in a good quality replacement scheme that appears to ministers to preserve or enhance the character and appearance of the conservation area.

“We note that your council has also given weight to the economic and social benefits of the proposed replacement scheme in reaching its conclusion that demolition is justified.

“We have no reason to doubt the merits of the replacement scheme, nor that economic benefits will result.

“On balance, whilst we believe that the considerations for demolition in Scottish Historic Environment Policy have not been fully met in respect of the retention of Bank House, as a property identified by your authority that contributes to the character of the conservation area, the loss of this unlisted building in the conservation area does not raise issues of such national significance that ministers would wish to intervene.

“We are thus clearing the case back to your authority to determine.”

The decision leaves the way clear for Upland Developments to tear down the derelict Victorian building and bring to an end a planning row which has dogged the town for more than three years.

Mr Tyrell said: “Not only is an irreplaceable building of merit being destroyed, but also a conservation area with great potential will disappear under a mass of unattractive concrete.

“The town showed the planners what could be done in a study which would have cost over £100,000 but for time donated by a professional team from The Mackintosh School of Architecture.

“Yet their impressive work, widely endorsed locally, was largely ignored, but for a few token gestures to better design.

“Now Pitlochry will have imposed upon it a cheap structure described by the Perth and Kinross planners themselves as ‘monolithic’. This, at the very centrepiece of one of Scotland’s more precious Victorian towns.

“The questions on everybody’s lips must be how could this be allowed to happen in a town with such tourist potential and unique reputation, and what will the tourists think of it?”

He continued: “To suggest that the Bank House could not have been saved is ludicrous. Much of its dilapidated appearance was due to the developer’s lack of interest in maintaining its gardens, as this helped his proposal.

“Immediately prior to the sale of that land, a notable local trust had shown an interest in purchasing it for their own use. Historic Scotland were made aware of this fact, as were Perth and Kinross councillors and planners.”