Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

Developers claim project will deliver 1,500 ‘much needed’ houses for west Perth

Developers claim project will deliver 1,500 ‘much needed’ houses for west Perth

Developers behind a plan for 1,500 houses, that has led to a legal hearing at one of the country’s top law courts and a public inquiry, have claimed the controversial proposal would deliver “much needed” housing for west Perth.

The Pilkington Trust said it was pleased by the bombshell announcement that the contentious Almond Valley plan has been backed by the Scottish Government’s Local Development Plan Examination Report.

As a result, it is being recommended to be incorporated into the adopted local plan despite a recent decision at the Court of Session, refusing an appeal by the trust.

The Almond Valley village plan comprised 1,500 homes, a primary school, and leisure and retail office facilities to be built on land adjacent to Huntingtowerfield and Ruthvenfield.

Perth and Kinross Council refused the Almond Valley plan in December 2011 and it was removed from the Local Development Plan a month later. T

he Pilkington Trust appealed the refusal to the Scottish Government and a public inquiry was held in Perth in July/August last year.

Katrina Rice, the Scottish Government’s directorate for planning and environmental appeals reporter, then dismissed the appeal.

The trust took its fight to the Court of Session in Edinburgh in July this year and Lord Armstrong again refused the appeal.

Alastair Wood, a planning director with Savills, who act on behalf of the Pilkington Trust, told The Courier that a fresh application for Almond Valley will now be submitted to Perth and Kinross Council and that the developers aim to hold talks with local residents to allay their “concerns”.

He said: “The Scottish Government’s decision here is binding there is no alternative option. We always thought that was the case but it is unfortunate it has taken so long to get to this stage. We have had two years of appeals and challenges and a lot of expense to the Pilkington Trust and Perth and Kinross Council.”

He went on: “There was a lot of local opposition to the Almond Valley plan but that was set against the wider benefits for the whole of Perth as this will create jobs and investment in the medium term.

“This proposal will bring much-needed housing to Perth.”

Council leader Ian Miller has said that it will take “some time” for local authority officers to examine the full details of the recommendations in the Scottish Government document.

A spokesperson for Perth and Kinross Council commented: “The council now has a period of three months to consider the reporter’s recommendations before publishing a modified Local Development Plan.

“Over the next few weeks we will examine its contents carefully and then report the examination findings to a future meeting of the council.

“It is important to highlight that the reporter’s recommendations do not relate to any specific planning applications.”