Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

Chinese investors undeterred by criticism of Scottish Government talks

The First Minister signed a memorandum of understanding (MOU) with SinoFortone and China Railway No 3 Engineering Group (CR3) in April 2016
The First Minister signed a memorandum of understanding (MOU) with SinoFortone and China Railway No 3 Engineering Group (CR3) in April 2016

Two Chinese companies which have signed a multibillion-pound investment agreement with the Scottish Government will not be put off by political criticism of the talks, the UK adviser to one of the firms has said.

First Minister Nicola Sturgeon signed a “memorandum of understanding” (MoU) last month with SinoFortone and China Railway No 3 Engineering Group (CR3) which could be worth up to £10 billion.

But it has since emerged that China Railway Group Limited (CRG), the owner of CR3, has been hit by corruption allegations in its homeland which resulted in Norway’s oil fund blacklisting the firm.

Ms Sturgeon said earlier this week that she was “not aware” of the allegations against the parent company.

But opposition parties raised questions over the level of scrutiny carried out by the Scottish Government before the MoU was signed.

Speaking on the election campaign trail in Edinburgh on Wednesday, Ms Sturgeon said: “What happened is we signed a memorandum of understanding to explore options for investment.

‘If we get to the stage where there are any proposals for investment, then full due diligence will be done at that stage. That’s how these things normally happen.

“There are no actual proposals on the table at this stage, and if that changes then those proposals will go through the normal process.”

Sir Richard Heygate, senior adviser for CR3, said there were some specific projects in mind, including for affordable housing in three areas of Scotland.

Speaking in an interview on BBC Radio Scotland, he said: “We could not be more squeaky clean in terms of backing from the very top of the Chinese state.”

He added: “The companies that we are dealing with, you could not be more A star star star in terms of reliability, credibility and backing…”

The Scottish Government was already under fire from its political opponents for not publicising the MoU at the time it was signed. Instead, news of the agreement had been published on the SinoFortone website on March 21.

Asked about his response to the political criticism of the talks, Sir Richard said it would not put the companies off investing.

In the wake of Sir Richard’s comments that projects had already beenidentified, Scottish Labour has called for full publication of documentssurrounding the deal.

The party’s public services spokeswoman, Jackie Baillie, said: “Sir Richard Heygate’s interview lifts the lid on the SNP’s secret deal with China. The fact that discussions have been going on for a year without SNP ministers providing any detail is extraordinary.

“On Wednesday Nicola Sturgeon said there were no proposals on the table, yet today the UK representative of the Chinese consortium has confirmed that at least three projects have been identified across the country.

Nicola Sturgeon has simply not been telling the truth and that is unacceptable. Nicola Sturgeon has misled Scots on this deal.”

Ms Baillie added: “It’s time for the SNP to stop the ducking and diving. Nicola Sturgeon should order the full publication of all documents relating to this deal, going as far back as a year ago when talks first began.”