Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

Edinburgh International Film Festival urged to look to the past

Post Thumbnail

Academics at St Andrews University say they have unlocked the secret to ensuring a bright future for the Edinburgh International Film Festival (EIFF).

Stinging criticism has been levelled at the extravaganza in recent times, with some claiming it lacks any real identity.

However, the authors of a new book published by film scholars at St Andrews University insist those behind the festival should look to the past to map the way ahead.

The experts say the new team behind the annual event should rewind to the heady seventies for inspiration.

They claim the festival, which kicks off this week, has for too long lacked the “thought-out” cultural agenda that once prompted Hollywood star John Huston to describe it as “the only festival worth a damn”.

In the book, former festival staff member Matthew Lloyd describes how he left in 2008 after witnessing “an increasing uncertainty concerning the festival’s identity”.

St Andrews film studies publisher Dr Alex Marlow-Mann can understand such concern but insists all is not lost.

“Amidst fierce criticism in the run-up to this year’s festival, Lloyd provides valuable insights that should give both sides of the debate cause for thought,” he said.

“It is a timely reminder that from its earliest days Edinburgh has been quite unlike any other film festival.”

While critics have attacked this year’s reduced programme, high ticket prices and the lack of an overall curatorial project, new director James Mullighan has declared his intention of resetting the festival’s agenda, reinventing it for modern audiences.

In the first book to explore the festival’s most influential period (1968-1980), Lloyd describes how intellectuals, critics and film-makers flocked to an event that was immediately recognised internationally as an agenda-setter.

Dr Marlow-Mann continued, “During these years, Edinburgh had a clearly defined and radical curatorial project. The festival went against the grain and interrogated mainstream notions of international film culture.

“It is a legacy that the festival organisers need to fully absorb and communicate to their critics before they can achieve their avowed aim of making EIFF ‘the brain of the British film industry’.”

How the Movie Brats Took Over Edinburgh: The Impact of Cinephilia on the Edinburgh International Film Festival, 1968-1980, is published by St Andrews Film Studies, 2011.

Image used under Creative Commons licence courstey of Flickr user atomicjeep.