Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

Former Dundee United striker Kevin Gallacher accused over pub dog attack

Former Dundee United striker Kevin Gallacher accused over pub dog attack

Former Dundee United striker Kevin Gallacher “took his eye off the ball” as his golden retriever bit a seven-year-old girl on the head in a pub beer garden, a court has heard.

The former Scotland international is said to have let the youngster stroke his dog, Baxter, unsupervised as he turned to chat to a friend at a picnic table.

The girl needed hospital treatment for lacerations to her face and scalp after she said she was bitten “three, four times”, Blackburn Magistrates’ Court heard.

Gallacher, 48, denies owning a dog which was dangerously out of control at The Bonny Inn in Clayton le Dale, Blackburn, on September 28 last year.

Opening the case, prosecutor Andrea Fawcett said: “The Crown’s case is that this was an omission on the part of Mr Gallacher. An omission in that he has failed to supervise the contact between (the girl) and Baxter.

“Mr Gallacher, by his own admission, is an experienced dog owner and as such must have known that any animal is never entirely predictable, and if you own a dog, from a Yorkie to a pitbull, you must have some duty of care for anyone who comes into contact with your animal.

“The prosecution further say that this incident took place in a busy beer garden. It is an environment which, it is fair to say, where there were unsupervised young children playing around and certainly at least one other dog in that area.”

She said the defendant consented to the girl’s request to stroke his dog.

She went on: “The prosecution say that should have rang alarm bells and that contact between (the girl) and Baxter, however long it took, should have been supervised by the owner of the dog, Mr Gallacher.

“The prosecution case is that is not what happened and, in effect, he has resumed his conversation with a friend who he was talking to at the time, and he has taken his eye off the ball.

“It is clear that he did not actually see what happened. The Crown’s case, in a nutshell, is that he should have done.”

When interviewed by police, the girl said: “I asked the man if I could stroke him (the dog). He said yes. I stroked him and he just turned on me.

“He just bit me. Bit me really hard … he bit me three, four times.”

She said the dog was on a lead and sat down, but said the man was not holding it as it was tied to the bench where he sat.

Giving evidence, the girl agreed with Gallacher’s solicitor Kathryn Jamieson-Sinclair that she may have frightened Baxter when she went to continue stroking him under the table bench.

The court heard that a family friend carried the injured girl into the pub where her parents were.

In a statement, the girl’s mother recalled telling Gallacher in the pub: “You want to get that dog under control with a muzzle.”

Giving evidence in his defence, Gallacher said he believed he had control of eight-year-old Baxter, who he had owned since he was a puppy.

He said he held the dog’s collar and lead when the girl patted his dog at his side before Baxter laid underneath the bench.

Gallacher said he turned from his astride position at the picnic table to face his friend, with his feet touching the dog.

He then heard “a yelp” from underneath the table which he compared to a sound if he stepped on the dog’s tail.

He looked down and Baxter was sat “placid as if nothing had happened” and the girl was in a squat position.

He told the court: “There was no crying, which I thought strange. I asked her three times if she was okay.

“As I moved her hair away, I noticed a cut to her head.”

Ms Jamieson-Sinclair asked him: “Do you believe you had control of your dog?”

He replied: “I believe I had control of my dog.”

The solicitor continued: “Do you believe Baxter was doing anything untoward?”

Gallacher said: “No, I don’t believe he has done anything untoward.”

Ms Jamieson-Sinclair said: “Did you feel in any way concerned that day at any point over his behaviour?”

The defendant said: “I had no reason to feel concerned. I had more reason to feel concerned for the child because I didn’t know what happened.”

Gallacher said Baxter was a “good-natured dog” with no previous problems who regularly played with his two daughters.

He told police that Baxter’s actions may have caused the injuries but not his nature.

The court heard that Baxter was the third golden retriever that he and his wife, Aileen, had owned and the dog had been trained through The Kennel Club.

He said Baxter had been to The Bonny Inn pub “a few times” without incident.

He said: “I always keep him in close proximity.

“Even though he is tied I am stroking him.”

Gallacher agreed with the prosecutor that he did not think to ask the girl tobe careful before she stroked Baxter.

But he said the girl “stepped back” to the corner of the bench after the initial stroke.

He said: “I believe the child should have come back to me and asked if she could stroke him again. That is what I have always been told by my parents.”

He disagreed that the whole incident happened “in a matter of seconds” and was instead “nearer to 30 seconds plus”.

He said when he turned to face his friend the girl was “nowhere within touching distance of the dog”.

Earlier, two doctors who treated the girl told the court the injuries were consistent with a dog bite but they could not “conclusively” say that was the cause of the injuries.

Ms Fawcett asked Gallacher: “Are you personally suggesting that Baxter did not bite (the girl)?”

He replied: “I am not personally suggesting Baxter did not bite her. I have a belief that he did not.”

The prosecutor said: “Are you saying she is mistaken how she got injured?”

Gallacher said: “I don’t know how she got the injuries.”

He denied taking “zero notice” of the girl while she was with his dog.

The court has heard there were no witnesses to the alleged dog bite other than the girl.

The trial continues.