Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner.

Hope for Laurencekirk flyover objections to be resolved after Transport Scotland meeting

The Laurencekirk junction can prove very tricky to navigate.
The Laurencekirk junction can prove very tricky to navigate.

A safety campaigner fighting for a flyover at the notorious Laurencekirk junction says she’s “hopeful” plans will progress after meeting with the Scottish Government’s transport minister.

Jill Fotheringham, a florist from Laurencekirk, has called for improvements at the junction between the A90 Stonehaven to Dundee road and the A937 Laurencekirk to Montrose road for more than 16 years.

Jill Fotheringham, from Laurencekirk, has long been campaigning for safety improvements.

The crossing has been the site of many crashes and near-misses, and last month it emerged that more than half of all speeding offences recorded by average speed cameras on the A90 took place there.

In 2016, the Scottish Government confirmed £24 million plans for a safety improvement project, which at the time had been planned to be in place by 2022.

However, last year it emerged that objections from four parties, including one from Aberdeenshire Council, could push back any upgrades even further.

‘I’m hopeful it can be resolved’

But this week, following a meeting with Transport Minister Graeme Dey, as well as Angus North and Mearns MSP Mairi Gougeon, Ms Fotheringham says she’s confident that three of the four objections will be resolved.

Plans for the Laurencekirk Flyover on show at a public consultation last year.

However, she said she doesn’t have the same confidence in the objection raised by Aberdeenshire Council.

The four objections relate to compulsory acquisition of land and access arrangements.

Ms Fotheringham said: “They told me they’re working very closely with the objectors and are ironing out details.

“The impression that I got from the discussion was that yes, they’ll be able to come up with solutions for everything, but the Aberdeenshire Council one is a tricky one.

“But they’re working on ways on how they can bring this forward.

“I’m hopeful that it can be resolved, I do feel that Transport Scotland are true to their word and they are committed, the impression I got from the meeting is they’re as anxious to bring this forward as anyone.”

‘Not so reassured by Aberdeenshire Council’

Ms Fotheringham added: “Graeme Dey told me he travels that road all the time and sees that junction all the time, and he wants it as much as we do, it’s very evident.

“He wants to get this project going, and so I’m very reassured by that, however I’m not so reassured by Aberdeenshire Council.

Jill Fotheringham at the A90 at Laurencekirk.

“I’m worried about the fact they have held it up.

“They’re going to have to take their time to avoid further delays, and sort it all out so that this doesn’t happen again, but that’s what the meetings in Laurencekirk were for, to let everyone see what was going on, and what the plans were going to be so there would be no delays.

“Aberdeenshire Council was part of that. They were involved in that, step-by-step, and yet they wait until the plans are done and the decisions have been made to come in with an objection.

“I find that unhelpful.”

A local public inquiry may be required, but Transport Scotland remains ‘optimistic’

A spokesman for Transport Scotland said that if the concerns of the objectors are not resolved, it could force a public inquiry, which could further delay the long-awaited project.

Graeme Dey, transport minister.

He said: “We received four objections to proposals during the statutory consultation period for the draft Orders and we continue to negotiate with objectors to try and resolve concerns where possible.

“Should we be unsuccessful in removing all objections a public local inquiry may be required. As with all trunk road projects this is the appropriate forum for considering objections received and not withdrawn.

“Delivery of the scheme itself can only commence if it is approved under the relevant statutory procedures, at which point a timetable for its progress can be set.”

The spokesman explained that there is no hard time limit for resolving the objections.

He continued: “Transport Scotland is continuing to engage with the objectors to the scheme, and we remain optimistic that this constructive dialogue will help to resolve objections where possible.

An artist impression of the Laurencekirk junction
An early artist’s impression of the plans for the Laurencekirk junction.

“No defined period for negotiating with objectors exists, however, we continue to make progress in moving matters forward towards possible resolution of the remaining objections to the scheme.

Aberdeenshire Council’s objection

A spokesman for Aberdeenshire Council said the local authority’s concerns relate to access of homes the Oatyhill area, which lies just south-west of Laurencekirk.

He said: “Aberdeenshire Council is committed to support the project and anticipate that a technical solution can be found to both deliver the long awaiting junction improvement, but also maintain safe access to the dwellings south of Oatyhill.

“Aberdeenshire Council continues to meet regularly with Transport Scotland and their technical team to look at solutions, and is committed to maintaining a high level of partnership working on the project.”

Already a subscriber? Sign in

[[title]]

[[text]]