Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

Fury as minister sets back ‘pardons’ for gay men

Labour former minister Chris Bryant delivering an an emotional speech in the House of Commons
Labour former minister Chris Bryant delivering an an emotional speech in the House of Commons

MPs reacted with fury when a minister scuppered the progress of proposals for an automatic pardon for gay men convicted of now-abolished sexual offences.

Labour’s Chris Bryant was close to tears as he joined fellow MPs in urging the Government to pardon all living gay men who were convicted of crimes that are no longer on the statute books.

But Justice Minister Sam Gyimah spoke for more than 20 minutes at the end of a lengthy debate to prevent a so-called “Turing Bill” brought forward by the SNP’s John Nicolson from being put to a vote.

The Government announced on Thursday plans for thousands of gay and bisexual men convicted of out-of-date offences to be posthumously pardoned.

But Mr Nicolson brought forward a private member’s bill which sought to go even further, proposing an automatic pardon for the living too.

Tory former justice minister Crispin Blunt warned the Government’s proposals did not have the desired “symbolic effect”, while party colleague Nigel Adams labelled the behaviour of ministers “a little bit slippery”.

Mr Gyimah urged Mr Nicolson to withdraw the Bill and work with the Government, but the SNP MP accused ministers of trying to “hijack” his legislation.

The SNP failed in an attempt to curtail the debate and prevent the Bill from being scuppered.

SNP chief whip Mike Weir moved a closure motion which, if agreed, would have prompted a vote on Mr Nicolson’s proposals.

The motion was supported by 57 MPs with no votes against, but parliamentary rules require at least 100 MPs to vote in favour of such a motion, meaning it failed.

Mr Gyimah rose to his feet with about 25 minutes of the debate left and he proceeded to speak until 2.30pm, denying MPs a vote on the plans. He was heckled, with shouts of “shame” and “shameful” from angry MPs as the seconds ticked down and proceedings came to an end.

The debate had been punctuated by emotional speeches from MPs on both sides of the chamber, as they urged the Government to support Mr Nicolson’s Sexual Offences (Pardons Etc) Bill during its second reading.

Mr Bryant, a Labour former minister, recalled gay and bisexual MPs who “faced down” Adolf Hitler, insisting they and others should receive “something that feels like an apology”.

The Government has stressed that anyone living who has been convicted of such abolished offences can already apply through the Home Office to have their names cleared through the disregard process, which removes any mention of an offence from criminal record checks.

Ministers are also planning to introduce a new statutory pardon for the living in cases where offences have been deleted through the disregard process.

The Government intends to bring forward its proposals in the form of an amendment to the Policing and Crime Bill.

Mr Gyimah said: “As well as honouring the dead (Mr Nicolson) seeks a pardon for the living. We have developed a way to do this without giving any perception that the pardon covers perpetrators of sex with a minor or non-consensual sex.

“What I would like to do today is to make a full and open offer to the honourable member to work with officials in the Ministry of Justice and the Home Office and Stonewall to give real effect to this pardon for the dead and the living as fairly and quickly as possible.”

Mr Nicolson said he had accepted an offer of help from the Government in June and that there had been “plenty of time to chat about this”.

He accused the Government of attempting to “hijack” his plans, adding: “The amendment accepted by the Government would grant an automatic pardon to the deceased and of course that’s great, but my Bill provides the same provision.

“But I have to ask the House, should we not prioritise the living over the dead?”

Debate on the Bill is set to resume on December 16 but it is unlikely to progress without the support of the Government.