Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

Developer surprises community by coming back with revised and more welcome Invervar hydro plans

Post Thumbnail

The developer behind a controversial hydro scheme has gone back to the drawing board to placate opponents in west Perthshire.

The scheme for Invervar in Glen Lyon was backed by Perth and Kinross Council two years ago and later approved by ministers, despite hundreds of objections.

Villagers opposed the plans since they were put forward in 2007 by a local landowner, claiming they would be the cause of significant noise nuisance and could be a potential health risk.

The forcing of the scheme’s powerhouse into the centre of the tiny village was described as a ”flagrant act of vandalism”, but the Invervar Hydro Partnership nonetheless pushed ahead with its plans.

Having been granted permission, it was given five years to bring the development to fruition under the direction of Green Highland Renewables.

Now, despite that consent, the developer has come back to submit revised plans that address many of the concerns of the time, in a surprising move that has already found favour with the local community council.

Two years ago, the community was told that the river-fed station would produce 1.2 megawatts of energy and would play an important part in Perthshire’s renewables contribution.

Ministers said Invervar was an example of a scheme that would ”operate in harmony with the environment to meet the electricity demands of around 700 homes.”

Local councillor Ian Campbell meanwhile welcomed the development as an important addition to ”Perthshire’s renewable contribution.”

Although all national guidelines were met by the plan, locals claimed the potential loss of their private water supply, together with noise nuisance and vibration, would ”devastate their fragile community” as most villagers live within yards of the scheme’s power station.

Hundreds of objections were received from residents and holidaymakers from as far afield as the USA, while there was also opposition from the Scottish Green Party, the Mountaineering Council of Scotland, the Scottish Ramblers, the Scottish Canoe Association and Perthshire Housing Association.

Now the detail of the development will go back before the Scottish Government, with an application calling for variations to the original consent granted by ministers including alterations to the design of the powerhouse and water intake locations having been lodged.

The changes have the backing of the Glenlyon and Loch Tay Community Council and in representations made to the local authority, the community council’s William Hoare said: ”The proposed changes have now been studied insofar as we have the expertise to do so.

”We consider these proposals will significantly alleviate the concerns expressed by a number of residents prior to, and following, the approval of the original scheme.

”While we regret the loss of some woodland as a result of the revised pipeline and access track south of the main road to the powerhouse, we agree these current proposals to be a better solution, especially in terms of noise and proximity to various properties in Invervar.”

Perth and Kinross Council is a statutory consultee, but the final decision will once again be made by the ministers.

Photo Google Maps.