Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

OPINION: COP26 court boycott is evidence of our broken legal aid system

Lawyers are demanding more funding to prop up Scotland's legal aid system and ensure people have access to justice.
Lawyers are demanding more funding to prop up Scotland's legal aid system and ensure people have access to justice.

Local faculties and bar associations, representing lawyers across Scotland have announced they will not sign up to the additional custody courts to be held over three weekends during COP26.

It is sadly, highly predictable.

As the Law Society’s Criminal Legal Aid convener, alongside many of my peers and colleagues in the criminal defence bar, I have been pressing for change and proper funding for legal aid.

This is not just in relation to the additional custody courts planned for the duration of the COP26 climate change summit.

It is to ensure that the legal aid system and our courts function properly now and for the long term.

The criminal defence bar in Scotland plays a central role in a modern system of criminal justice, which is fair and transparent.

It is a system which acknowledges the presumption of innocence, the rule of law and the need for due process.

The challenges around ensuring capacity for this landmark event have raised wider issues around the funding and sustainability of the legal aid sector and the growing imbalance in funding across the criminal justice system.

It relies equally on the judiciary, the prosecution and the defence.

If any one of these is out of balance, the whole is put at jeopardy.

No one wants a situation where people are in custody but can’t get a solicitor.

But the lack of funding over decades means we have reached a point where criminal defence firms struggle to recruit and to retain people and it’s all but impossible to deal with the sheer volume of work we are being asked to do.

Without significant investment which will allow firms like my own to be able to offer more attractive pay and conditions, it’s a problem that’s not going anywhere.

COP26 will add to court pressures

That COP26 is likely to add to the already acute pressure on the courts and court backlog as a result of the pandemic cannot be ignored.

However no solicitors will have taken the decision to withdraw from the duty custody court scheme lightly.

It is our job to be there to represent clients, but the demands being placed on the criminal defence profession currently are too high and no long term solutions are being offered.

The additional courts planned for COP26 are simply the straw that has finally broken the camel’s back.

So many solicitors have gone above and beyond, again and again, to ensure that those who rely on their expertise were not disadvantaged and that our justice systems continued to function, particularly during the past 18 months.

We pushed hard for support during the Covid-19 pandemic. And we were pleased that the government agreed to create the legal aid resilience and recovery fund to offer a much-needed financial lifeline.

We appreciate that Scottish Government has made the case for additional funding to the UK Government and will put legal aid fee arrangements in place for the COP26 period.

We also welcomed the Scottish Government’s agreement to provide a further £1 million as support for 40 new legal aid trainees this summer.

The fund, managed by the Law Society, will assist firms in nurturing new talent throughout these traineeships.

These initiatives have provided a financial respite for this hard-pressed, yet vital, part of the profession. But they are not enough.

Legal aid problems were present before pandemic

In the decade preceding the pandemic, the number of firms and solicitors providing criminal legal aid reduced by a quarter.

The number of civil legal aid firms fell by a fifth.

We were already concerned about the capacity and resilience of the sector before the pandemic. These concerns are more acute now.

There is ample evidence to support a new legal aid fee framework and for legal aid fees themselves to be increased to sustainable levels.

We believe that this increase should be at least 50%. The Law Society recommended this to government last year as necessary to prevent the situation which is now materialising.

This was rejected and we are, regrettably, seeing the outcomes of that.

It’s why we continue to call for long-term funding solutions to ensure that everyone, regardless of their financial means, has access to justice now and in the future.


Ian Moir is co-convener of the Law Society of Scotland Legal Aid Committee.