Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner.

JIM CRUMLEY: Why is Scotland still afraid of the big bad wolf?

Wolves are flourishing across Europe, so why not in Scotland?
Wolves are flourishing across Europe, so why not in Scotland?

I keep asking this question, and I never get an answer. What are they afraid of, what do they think will happen?

I am asking it again.

Forestry and Land Scotland has just announced a plan to spend the better part of £30 million of your money and mine killing 150,000 deer over five years.

The announcement was couched in familiar, cliché-strewn rhetoric.

Scotland’s deer population is “unnaturally high”, for example.

It doesn’t mention that it has been unnaturally high for around 250 years, which is roughly how long it is since the people who like to shoot deer finally rendered our native wolves extinct.

“Scotland is facing a substantial challenge in keeping its deer population at a level that is in balance with the environment,” according to the head of wildlife management at FLS.

“As responsible land managers we need to act to achieve the necessary balance within the deer population.”

It doesn’t say that “responsible land managers” have invented a very different idea from nature’s of what “the necessary balance” might look like.

This is nature manipulated out of all recognition by its worst enemy, which is people.

‘Let wildlife manage wildlife’

Not for the first time in this column, permit me to quote a friend in New Hampshire, a naturalist, writer and artist of rare distinction called David Carroll.

He says: “The term ‘wildlife management’, often used in the environmental polemics of the day in reference to human manipulations, is an oxymoron.

“We should have learned long ago to simply leave the proper natural space, to respectfully withdraw and let wildlife manage wildlife.”

Yes we should. But organisations like FLS, and private landowners from Galloway to Sutherland who all like to think of themselves as “responsible land managers” are terrified of the idea.

Besides, they don’t like to be told that nature is much, much better at the job.

If deer numbers need controlled are humans the best species to do it?

Out of idle curiosity, I looked at FLS’s website, and on their idiot’s guide to wildlife (they don’t call it that, it’s just how it comes across) it has this to say about deer:

“They graze a wide variety of plants, from grasses and heather to shrubs and trees. They only cause damage to the forest if there are too many of them.”

But the numbers are “unnaturally high” because “responsible land managers”, having first eradicated the possibility of wildlife managing wildlife by removing top predators from the face of the land, will tell you that deer shooting, like grouse shooting, is good for the rural economy.

Yet a thoughtful, questioning mind will quickly conclude that the number of deer is not the deer’s fault, but rather that of the manipulators of their environment.

Wolves are thriving in Europe so why not Scotland?

At every level of government and at every level of professional environmental practice, Scotland has declined even to contemplate the glaring, commonsense solution – the reintroduction of wild wolves.

So I ask the question again. What are they afraid of, what do they think will happen?

I have heard people who I thought would know better baulk at the idea of wolves.

They say Scotland today is too different from the land as it was when wolves last lived here.

One conservation organisation actually posed the question: are wolves too wild for Scotland?

What surprises and disappoints me is the widespread level of the ignorance that still prevails in 21st century Scotland about the reality of living with wild wolves.

Would wolves be a welcome addition to forests in Scotland?

Wolves are in every country in mainland Europe and if we had a land bridge they would be here.

They have recently returned to countries like Denmark, the Netherlands and Belgium, and no one has died.

Belgium now proudly proclaims the Ardennes forest as a crossroads of the wolf in Europe.

Scotland is suffering from absence of wolves

So here’s how it works in Scotland, or anywhere else with “unnaturally high” deer numbers.

In the wolfless centuries, the deer have forgotten how to behave like deer.

As soon as you reintroduce wolves, even in small numbers, they start to move the deer around.

That means the deer can no longer browse a landscape to the bone.

That means in turn that regeneration of all plant life surges.

And that means in turn that insect life soars, especially pollinators, which attracts birds, small mammals, then predators…

In the most famous wolf reintroduction project in the world at Yellowstone, the first animals to follow the wolves were beavers.

As the wolves began to move and break up the huge herds of elk, the regeneration created new opportunities for beavers.

They brought with them their capacity to spread wetland and that in turn created more biodiversity.

And so the process ripples out throughout the length and breadth of the ecosystem.

Scotland has substantial potential for wolves. Nature looks increasingly desperate without them.

Let wildlife manage wildlife. It’s one of the most beautiful things you could ever hope to see.

Our job is to remove the obstacles that we have put in nature’s path, then stand back and watch and listen, look and learn.

So what are they afraid of, what do they think will happen?


Read more by Jim Crumley.
Beaver ruling is a victory for all Scottish wildlidfe
Cambo oilfield approval would be a fatal mistake for the planet
A sky full of geese makes the years melt away

Already a subscriber? Sign in

[[title]]

[[text]]