Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

Environmental benefits will come at a cost

Future  environmental support options need to be better targeted than the current  system .
Future environmental support options need to be better targeted than the current system .

Taxpayers will need to support Scottish agriculture to the same level as the CAP does in order to achieve the environmental benefits  required by society.

That is one of the conclusions of the long-awaited CAP Greening Review Group report which has been published  by the Scottish Government.

The report, which has taken a year to produce, looked at how future policy and support mechanisms could benefit environmentally and economically sustainable farming, and it appears to chime with recent statements by Defra Secretary Michael Gove who envisages farmers being supported by public money for public goods.

It was produced under the chairmanship of Professor Russel Griggs,  and concludes that future environmental support options need to be better targeted than the  current system in order  to deliver positive outcomes for farmers and the environment.

It states: “It is envisaged that all payments would be associated with outcomes that deliver public good.

“In return for payments, farmers would have to undertake specific land management activities or meet certain requirements.”

Most significantly it points out the current “one size fits all” solution is not the best way to proceed and states that activities and requirements will need to be targeted to different farm types and geographic locations – although some universal requirements could also apply.

However it envisages all farmland, both in the uplands and the lowlands, being eligible for payments.

Two tiers of payments have been considered by the review group, with an “entry level” and a “higher level”.

The entry level would be open to all farmers and farmland and have the broad aim of protecting soil, air and water resources, reducing greenhouse gas emissions and maintaining farmland habitats and features important for wildlife such as hedgerows and winter stubbles.

This level should be made simple for farmers to access and for Government to administer.

A higher tier would contain more targeted or bespoke options offered by groups or sectors who have a “greater level of environmental ambition”. Accessing payments under this tier could be competitive.

The group also promotes the idea of cooperative or catchment-scale approaches to delivering environmental outcomes and has recommended that mechanisms to encourage greater cooperation and collaboration between farmers in Scotland should be included in any future policy framework.

Regulation also features in the review, and while it acknowledges that
monitoring will be required to safeguard public spending, farmers will be relieved to learn that it “must be done in a way that applies risk and common sense – and where necessary flexibility – to allow enhancements or  adaption that  fit circumstances better than the current system.”

nnicolson@thecourier.co.uk