Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

St Andrews University’s Kenly windfarm plans dealt new blow

The Kenley wind farm would help St Andrew's University to meet its ambitious renewable targets.
The Kenley wind farm would help St Andrew's University to meet its ambitious renewable targets.

St Andrews University’s windfarm plans have been dealt a blow by councillors’ refusal to let a cable be laid linking it to the national grid.

The university asked for the go-ahead to run a 33,000 volt cable nine miles underground between St Andrews and Kenly, near Boarhills, where it wants to build six turbines.

Energy produced by the 328ft turbines would be used to power its buildings, including laboratories where world-class research is conducted and student residences.

However, Fife Council’s north east planning committee refused its planning application due to concerns about traffic disruption, impact on residential amenity and insufficient information about how trees would be protected along the route via Stravithie, Lathockar and the A915.

It also again refused to amend a condition attached to the planning consent already issued for the turbines, which would have allowed work to start on site before agreement is reached with the Ministry of Defence on radar mitigation.

Many were worried about the impact of the cable, including fears about the perceived health risk from electromagnetic fields, and councillors criticised the university’s lack of communication with the public.

The university said the committee had disregarded robust assessments of its own planning, transport, structural and environment officials, the Scottish Government, the Scottish Environment Protection Agency and Scottish Natural Heritage.

A spokesman said: “What this decision confirms, however, is that the university was right not to engage in any detailed consultation with the community before plans were approved.

“Until planning experts and councillors are able to agree on what’s possible, we would simply be consulting on thin air.

“Without that clarity what is now at stake is our best chance to counter the damaging effects of future energy price rises and protect local jobs.

“We will consider our position once we have had opportunity to review the full judgement.”

The university has already warned that the project has been put at risk by a delay in agreeing a mitigation scheme with the MoD to prevent interference with radar at Leuchars.

However, planning consent allowing work to start on site may be issued imminently by a Scottish Government reporter as the university has challenged an earlier refusal by the committee to amend the radar condition.

During its deliberations, several members of the committee criticised the university’s lack of engagement with the public over the cable planning application.

Committee member Councillor Elizabeth Riches said: “I think it’s absolutely disgraceful that the university chose to ignore not one, not two but three community councils who are statutory consultees.

“Not one of them has had the courtesy from the university to explain what it is they are trying to do, to give some reassurance.

“As a result people have had to object because they do not know what is going on.”

Council planner Martin Patrick said the university was not required to conduct pre-application consultation and the committee was reminded that similar infrastructure works could be conducted by public bodies without the need for planning permission.

Mr Patrick also insisted people’s concerns had been taken very seriously before a recommendation was made that the application be approved.

The committee did, however, approve an amendment to one condition in relation to the windfarm which had the affect of renewing planning application, due to expire in October, for three years.