Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

MIKE DONACHIE: Oxbridge toffs ‘plundering’ British society

Post Thumbnail

England has announced major changes to the system that controls housing development, described as a “complete overhaul” by housing minister Robert Jenrick, and as a “complete nightmare” by me, just now, in this piece of writing.

In discussing this issue, there is first the difficult task of forcing yourself to stop staring at photographs of Robert Jenrick, who’s just about as Tory as a Tory ever did Tory.

A wealthy lawyer with a boring-yet-successful political career, he is a fascinatingly-standardised Conservative figure, as if Alan B’Stard made himself a new best friend out of pink plasticine.

Anyway, housing. Jenrick and the other braying Oxbridge toffs currently plundering British society want to simplify the English planning process, to make it easier to build houses in places that need them.

That’s a valid goal, which will only be reached as a side-effect. The real goal is making money, of course.

The changes will fast-track development and designate all land under one of three headings: worthy of protection, ready for renewal (meaning it can be developed after basic checks) or earmarked for growth, meaning planning permission will be given automatically. Yes, automatically.

There are details to come, and communities are already fighting back.

But the very principle of automatic planning permission should horrify anyone who understands how development affects communities.

Don’t confuse me with a NIMBY, by the way, because I used to write those stories for newspapers and found them frustrating.

Communities need development and that means change, even if wealthy retirees don’t like it.

This, however, is destructive change. It has the potential to devastate many areas and introduce housing density that would have shocked Dickens.

Automatic planning permission disenfranchises communities entirely and will mean dangerous, uncontrolled development.

Yes, let’s create opportunities for more people to buy their own homes, and focus on areas most in need.

But the planning process can become faster without becoming a free-for-all.
This is, as usual, all about profits for pals in pinstripes.

It’s post-Brexit deregulation of the type that history will judge harshly, and it wont stop here.

The Johnson government has the keys to the kingdom, and, if that scares you, it’s because you’re right.