Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

Fife could be focal point for research into energy source

Cash could be the stumbling block preventing the project moving forward.
Cash could be the stumbling block preventing the project moving forward.

Fife could yet become the focal point for plans to heat homes and businesses around Scotland using warm water recovered from rocks deep below the ground.

A Scottish Government-funded project has looked into the feasibility of using the largely untapped resource to deliver renewable heat at a site in Guardbridge in a cost effective manner.

With that in mind, researchers have now recommended that the initiative should be taken to the next stage – which would see a business case to explore for geothermal heat drawn up and could even lead to the drilling and testing of a well.

And while the study concedes that the viability of extending any heating system beyond the Guardbridge Energy Centre appears to be “uneconomic” at this time, it is thought the technological developments and lessons arising from any Fife project could be used elsewhere to great effect.

However, finance is set to be the main stumbling block – with no decision on funding to help progress the project likely to come until well after this week’s Scottish Parliament elections.

The University of St Andrews, which operates the £25 million Guardbridge Energy Centre, was a lead partner in the study, which also brought together teams from the British Geological Survey, Ramboll, Town Rock Energy Ltd, Fife Council, and Resource Efficient Solutions Ltd.

Dr Ruth Robinson, the lead for the geothermal feasibility project at the University of St Andrews, said: “The feasibility project investigated if there is a business case to explore for geothermal heat, and if feasible, the technological developments arising out of this project could be used for similar projects across Scotland.

“The findings based on one borehole are promising and certainly merit further investigation.”

An evaluation into the Guardbridge site showed a “potentially viable scheme both technically and economically”, although it noted there would be a “low return” in the base case.

Development of a wider district heating network which could heat homes in Leuchars and Balmullo had been looked at, but the study concluded that a single well would not provide sufficient heat to expand the network beyond the Guardbridge site.

However, the report confirmed that the location of the Guardbridge project is “ideal” for producing critical data on the most productive Hot Sedimentary Aquifers in the Central Belt of Scotland and could be used to “significantly de-risk” other HSA geothermal exploration projects.

It therefore recommends taking the project further, firstly by conducting a non-invasive geophysical survey of Guardbridge and the surrounding area to identify where boreholes could be made before then potentially drilling a well.

Any progress to an exploration phase will most likely require an Environmental Impact Statement and assessments from Scottish Natural Heritage and Fife Council, along with planning permission approval and necessary licenses from Fife Council and SEPA, as well as permission to drill under any land that is not part of the Guardbridge site.

Having said all that, however, further funding to develop the project is pivotal – and remains uncertain.

Preparatory work to procure a rig, draw up plans and secure permissions could take at least six months and incur planning costs of up to £50,000, while a test bore will cost between £100,000 to £450,000.