Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner.

‘Even one metre is generous’: Dundee expert says two-metre coronavirus rule is based on ‘flawed’ study

Dundee University's School of Medicine.
Dundee University's School of Medicine.

The “two-metre rule” to keep a safe distance when socialising may be based on a misunderstanding of studies into infection risk, a Tayside  expert has said.

Dr Mike Lonergan, senior statistician and epidemiologist at Dundee University’s School of Medicine, believes research showing the benefits of keeping a two -metre distance, the advice since the beginning of lockdown, is flawed.

Dr Lonergan has examined the studies of 25 countries around the world and found eliminating direct physical contact is the best way to reduce infection and anything more “adds little”.

Dr Mike Lonergan.

He begins his paper, available at Research Gate by saying “Even one metre seems generous” and adds public health advice may be better focused on highlighting the risk of cross-contamination through sharing hard surfaces.

“This re-analysis suggests there may be some benefit in remaining one metre away from infected individuals but that is likely to be small.

“It is much harder to find any support for advantages from greater separation distances here.

“If simply not touching infected individuals is likely to reduce infection risk by more than half, and longer separation distances add little to this, then there may be little benefit from long-range social distancing.

“These results could be taken as suggesting that the bulk of infection takes place through the direct transfer of material, rather than by an aerial route.

“If that is so, then, provided we refrain from coughing or spitting on each other, public health policy might be better concentrating more on limiting the touching of surfaces than on keeping people apart.”

The World Health Organisation (WHO) commissioned analysis of 25 papers from around the world examining the effects of separation distance on infection risk.

Although the WHO had previously recommended that people stay at least one metre away from each other, the researchers found that extending this distance significantly reduced the chances of infection.

Dr Lonergan,  who previously estimated lockdown could save around one million lives in the UK alone, re-examined the studies and believes these datasets were limited and contradict the researchers’ conclusion.

The original studies compared risk ratios are relative to those of touching and Dr Lonergan believes the researchers should not have calculated them in the way they have as many individuals in the closer groups had physical contact with an infected individual.

He added: “The most important way to prevent the spread of this coronavirus is to avoid touching an infected person, but questions about the safety of various distances between individuals remain.

“Our conclusion is that avoiding contact is very important and that a one metre distance might be slightly better than just avoiding contact but the difference is unlikely to be much.

“These data give no indication that two metres is better than one metre or just avoiding contact.”

The research has not yet been submitted for a formal peer review but Dr Lonergan wanted to make it available, given the importance of the social distancing debate.

Already a subscriber? Sign in