Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

Controversial car parking scheme pumps £320k into Angus coffers but falls well short of forecast

A cash payment option is to be installed at some of the Angus meters.
A cash payment option is to be installed at some of the Angus meters.

Angus Council’s controversial off-street parking charges scheme has failed to generate even half of the sum originally hoped for in its first year.

Eagerly awaited full-year data for the charging system, which returned to 33 local car parks in November 2018 after an absence of more than two decades, shows an overall net income of £324,219 for the 12 months.

The figure is less than 50% of the £700,000 financial forecast which had been attached to the scheme when it was agreed by councillors as part of the council’s 2018 budget.

An information report on the first-year picture will be presented to members of Angus Council’s communities committee in Forfar on Tuesday – weeks after the authority blocked a Freedom of Information request for the data, saying its release was “not in the public interest”.

The report reveals a total gross income from the meters – including £8,400 from a cash payment option brought in after criticism of the card-only system – of £481,000.

Parking permits of one, three, six or 12 month duration generated almost £160,000.

The addition of more than £50,000 from penalty charge notices took the total gross figure to £531,734.

Meters in Forfar’s Myre car park were the busiest, with 25,721 tickets dispensed, worth more than £50,000 to the council.

Forfar’s Myre car park on the day the charges came into force.

Ladybridge Street in Arbroath was also a popular and saw 16,505 meter tickets issued at a value of £37,833.

Officials say the half-million pound income figure had to be offset against a number of costs associated with the scheme, including set-up and staffing.

After taking those into account, finance chiefs have reported an overall surplus of £275,543.

A balance sheet adjustment relating to staffing resources boosts the total by some £48,000 to give a final net figure of £324,219.

Angus communities convener, Montrose independent councillor Mark Salmond said: “This is a significant income stream from visitors to Angus as well as our residents. It is one that didn’t previously exist that we are pleased to be investing in our communities.

“Parking charges are operated by councils across the UK and they are here to stay in Angus. I am confident that the use of our off-street car parks will increase.

“These additional funds will allow us to protect investment in our roads infrastructure and make our roads and streets safer for everyone now and in the years ahead.”

However, the authority’s cost calculations have been branded “laughable” by a leading critic of the scheme.

Kirriemuir garage owner Barrie Ewart led a petition protest against the introduction of the charges in their early days and has continued to campaign for them to be axed.

“I have had a look at the report and it is laughable how they have played down the cost of instigating and running the scheme,” he said.

“If you look at how many transactions they have had (163,217) and divide it by the amount of meters it equates to 13.5 transactions (cars parking) per day per meter – not a very profitable business decision considering it has killed off a huge percentage of the High Street trade which Angus Council say they are committed to promoting.

“Let’s hope that the council’s scrutiny and audit committee do what they are supposed to and ‘scrutinise’ these manipulated figures,” said Mr Ewart.