Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

£1k-a-week costs continue to mount over Angus leisure centre boarded up since 2017

The boarded-up Lochside Leisure Centre in Forfar.
The boarded-up Lochside Leisure Centre in Forfar.

An empty Angus leisure centre still standing after a Court of Session fight has cost taxpayers more than £1,000 a week to maintain since the shutters went up in 2017.

With councillors set to debate a call for a full independent review of the saga surrounding Lochside in Forfar, a Freedom of Information request has revealed the bill for the boarded-up building has now topped a quarter of a million pounds.

The centre was closed in February 2017.

The figure does not include the council’s court costs involved in fighting the challenge mounted by two town businessmen against the £450,000 demolition plan for the Forfar Loch building.

Lochside was replaced by new facilities at Forfar community campus and councillors agreed to raze the 45-year-old centre after council officials said it was sinking.

However, town developer Mark Guild and hotelier Donald Stewart branded the decision unlawful and ultimately succeeded in a legal fight in Scotland’s highest court.

The council is now considering its next move, which is likely to involve a full public consultation on the centre’s future.

Mark Guild (left) and Donald Stewart led the fight to save Forfar’s former Lochside leisure centre from demolition.

FOI figures have now revealed more than £56,000 was spent on Lochside in 2019/20 – the bulk of the costs a whopping rates bill of almost £45,000.

Security spending of £2,100, water and energy bills of £6,500 and £1,800 of maintenance added to the tally.

From the time the centre closed to March 2019, the Lochside bills totalled almost £175k.

Costs for this year are currently sitting around £3,000, but the authority expects the rates figure for the property to be reduced following a successful appeal.

Meanwhile, top level legal advice which led to councillors stepping back from taking the Lochside battle to the UK Supreme Court will remain confidential.

At a meeting on September 10, councillors agreed not challenge the majority ruling of the three-judge panel in the Inner House, a decision which overturned an earlier finding in favour of the authority over the handling of Lochside’s planned demolition.

Administration leader David Fairweather said at that time: “If we were to appeal this, given the council’s adherence to the principle of obtaining best value for the public purse, the financial risk of losing would be too great.”

An FOI request for the minute of the September meeting has now been rejected.

“Having considered the release of this report it has been concluded that it is exempt from release under section 36(1) of the Freedom of Information (Scotland) Act 2002 as it constitutes internal communication in the form of privileged legal advice in respect of which a claim to confidentiality of communications could be maintained,” said the council.

“The courts have long recognised the strong public interest in maintaining the right to confidentiality between legal adviser and client on administration of justice grounds.

“In addition, there is a strong public interest that public authorities can give and receive legal advice in confidence while discharging their functions as effectively as possible,” said the council.”

Forfar councillor Braden Davy has lodged a motion for a special full meeting of the council on Monday, demanding an independent review into the saga and seeking action on the consultation around its future.