Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

Former top councillor’s bid for Kinnettles country house and tennis court knocked back by Angus planners

An architect's design of the planned house at Brigton, near Douglastown. Image: Brunton Design/Angus Council
An architect's design of the planned house at Brigton, near Douglastown. Image: Brunton Design/Angus Council

Angus Council planning officials have knocked back a country house bid by a leading figure in the authority’s last administration.

Angus Macmillan Douglas hoped to build his retirement pad in a field beside the village of Douglastown, between Forfar and Glamis.

He was a Conservative councillor for Kirriemuir and the previous ruling group’s deputy leader and finance spokesman.

The 75-year-old former BP HR director wanted to build a two-storey, four bedroom house complete with tennis court in a field at Brigton.

Brigton house bid
An architect’s impression of the house interior. Image: Brunton Design/Angus Council

Long-standing family link

His family connections there go back three centuries.

But planners rejected the idea of using farmland as a site for the executive home.

Mr Macmillan Douglas says he accepts the planning officials’ “well thought through” reasons for the rejection.

Angus Macmillan Douglas
Angus Macmillan Douglas was finance spokesman during Angus Council’s last administration.

The field he hoped to build on is beside Brigton farmhouse, right on the edge of Douglastown.

His application suggested the land was a gap site between the farmhouse and the edge of the village.

But planning officials said it breached policy because the greenfield site is outside the development boundary.

Delegated ruling

“It is suggested that there is a social benefit in allowing the applicant to retire in surroundings which are in his ownership and where the family has a long-standing connection,” said the delegated decision.

“There is no evidence to suggest the applicant would suffer significant hardship if planning permission was refused and, in these circumstances, the personal circumstances of the applicant are given little weight.

“There is certainly no evidence to suggest the erection of a single house to meet a private interest would be in the wider public interest.”

Design criticised

And officials were not impressed by the design of the house.

They did not like the property’s multi-pitched roof with a variety of eaves and dormers.

“In this case, design is a secondary consideration as the principle of development is contrary to development plan policy,” they said.

Brigton house application
A night-time impression of the planned house. Image: Brunton Design/Angus Council

“However, the design does not reflect and complement traditional properties in the area.

“The traditional properties at Brigton, some properties in Douglastown, and properties in nearby Kirkton of Kinnettles provide a distinctive form that could inform the design of new development in the area.

“It may be an appropriate design for an urban area, but it is not appropriate for a countryside location.”

Appeal option

Mr Macmillan Douglas said: “I take a grown up view of these things.

“You apply for planning permission, the planners come up with a well thought through reason for refusal and that is life.

“There was a counter argument my architect very much promoted that it was a gap site and would round off the buildings group.

“But the planners did not see it that way.

“Those are the rules and you must accept them.”

Mr Macmillan Douglas could appeal the refusal to the council’s development management review committee.

“It’s something I will discuss with my architect, but probably won’t appeal,” he said.

Conversation