Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

Community campaigners keeping fight for answers on Heart 200 tourism funding alive

Susan Dolan-Betney, Chair of Glen Lyon and Loch Tay Community Council, is amongst those fighting for an answer.
Susan Dolan-Betney, Chair of Glen Lyon and Loch Tay Community Council, is amongst those fighting for an answer.

Campaigners across Perthshire are digging in in their battle for answers on taxpayer funding for a controversial tourist route.

Representatives of around half a dozen community councils attended a meeting at Fearnan yesterday where they formulated a plan to press Audit Scotland for an investigation into Perth and Kinross Council’s financial backing for the Heart 200 project.

The independent watchdog ruled out a probe into the £45,000 award earlier this year after discussing it with the local authority’s auditors.

However, critics are still not satisfied with the way the funds for the team promoting the route, taking in 200 miles of rural Perthshire and Stirlingshire, were allocated.

They say the council failed to carry out adequate environmental or economic impact assessments and did little in the way of tendering.

Yesterday’s meeting was organised by Loch Tay and Glen Lyon Community Council (LTGLCC) and chaired by SNP candidate for Perth and North Perthshire Pete Wishart. It was attended by representatives of around half a dozen community councils, including Portmoak and Dunkeld and Birnam.

There is no formal process for appealing the Audit Scotland decision but the body can expect to receive letters from each community group asking for a review of the work it carried out.

The campaigners said that if the watchdog does not reopen its investigation, they will call for an independent inquiry.

They will also urge Perth and Kinross Council’s audit committee to review the case internally.

Susan Dolan-Betney, LTGLCC chairwoman, said: “We are still unhappy with the results. We are urging everyone to write to Audit Scotland to ask them to reconsider their decision.”

The council said it did not want to comment on the steps planned by the community councils. It has previously praised Audit Scotland for making the right call.

Speaking last month, a spokesperson said: ““We have an exemplary record in financial management, and a robust approach to self-evaluation through our normal audit process, and we are pleased to hear that Audit Scotland do not intend to investigate this matter further.

“The findings of the Best Value Assurance report highlighted our effective approach to financial planning, and acknowledges that we are well placed to deal with any current and future financial pressures.”

Heart 200 bosses said they were not aware that the meeting was taking place.

Speaking previously, Heart 200 founder Robbie Cairns said: “We welcome Audit Scotland’s decision and, indeed welcomed the call for Audit Scotland to investigate in the first instance, as we were very comfortable that Perth and Kinross Council’s funding decision would stand up to scrutiny.”