Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

Revised block of flats plan fails to allay loss-of-privacy worries

Land earmarked for three housing blocks at Allison Crescent.
Land earmarked for three housing blocks at Allison Crescent.

Residents are fighting plans to build three blocks of flats at a Perth housing estate.

Construction firm GS Brown wants to transform an acre of vacant land off Allison Crescent, on the northern outskirts of the city.

The company scrapped its original plan for 27 flats at the site after a backlash from local residents.

But now its revised plan – reducing the number of properties to 26 – has come up against fresh opposition.

Locals are worried the new blocks will overshadow their homes and rob them of their privacy.

There are also concerns about a rise in traffic, with more than 50 parking spaces included in the design.

The site is near a new A85/A9 junction which is being built to unlock new development land at Bertha Park.

GS Brown general manager Martin Smith said: “The final phase of our Tulloch development was designed taking into consideration the positive response we have received to the flats nearing completion across the road.

“There have been a broad spectrum of purchasers who are delighted with the quality, high specification and spaciousness of their new homes.”

He added: “Following the original application for the final phase a positive meeting was held with the planning officer. His comments were taken on board and a revised proposal was submitted thus allowing the neighbouring properties to consider the amendments.

“We appreciate concerns have still been raised, many of which relate to points outwith our control, however it is our view that this proposal sits well within the development and is a positive response to the current housing market conditions.”

So far, the revised application has attracted 22 letters and e-mails from objectors, calling for the scheme to be scrapped.

In his letter to officials, resident Douglas Pymm said the GS Brown had failed to address concerns about privacy, the main complaint of residents in Pullar Terrace.

He said any infringement of private life could be seen as a violation of the European Human Rights Act.

“It is clear that these proposals would not serve to benefit the residents of Pullar Terrace, but would rather cause an increased inconvenience and upset to the natural progression of daily private life,” he said.

Another opponent said windows from two of the blocks would look directly into her kitchen and bedrooms. “The main reason for purchasing this house was the fact that we had no one looking over us,” she said. “Equally, I don’t want to look across to see others in their living and sleeping space.”

The company’s application will be brought before councillors for a final decision in the coming months.