Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

Supreme Court’s named person ruling: what it means

The Scottish Government says the plan is part of its efforts to make Scotland the best country in which to grow up.
The Scottish Government says the plan is part of its efforts to make Scotland the best country in which to grow up.

Campaigners have won a challenge at the UK’s highest court against the Scottish Government’s named person legislation but it does not mean the law cannot be implemented if parts of it are changed.

What is the named person legislation?

Part of the Children and Young People (Scotland) Act 2014 passed at Holyrood, the law involves a single point of contact, such as a teacher or health visitor, appointed to look after the welfare of every child in Scotland up to age 18.

 

Why did the Scottish Government create the new law?

Scottish ministers say the service will act as a safety net to help families and children if needed.

 

Why is it controversial?

Objectors to the scheme claim it legitimises state snooping and say it breaches the human rights of parents, eroding family privacy in favour of the state.

 

Who brought the legal challenge?

An appeal against the law was brought by four charities – The Christian Institute, Family Education Trust, The Young ME Sufferers Trust and CARE (Christian Action Research and Education) – and three individuals, Falkirk couple James and Rhianwen McIntosh and Deborah Thomas from Comrie in Perthshire.

 

What did the court decide?

Five judges sitting at the Supreme Court allowed the objectors’ appeal. They ruled the overall aim of the legislation in appointing named persons does not breach human rights but singled out the information-sharing protocols in the new law, ruling they may interfere in human rights to a family and private life as well as risking breaching rules on privacy and confidentiality.

 

What happens now?

The court ruled the law cannot be brought in to force “in the meantime” and has given the Scottish Parliament and Scottish ministers 42 days “to agree an order which will set out a timetable for rectifying the legislation, if they so wish”. Campaigners have hailed the ruling as a victory but the Scottish Government said it will bring the law into force as soon as possible and is now working on the changes required.