Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

Comment: No excuse if MPs let standards slip

QUALITY COUNTS: Farmers in the UK produce food to some of the highest standards in the world.
QUALITY COUNTS: Farmers in the UK produce food to some of the highest standards in the world.

The chill in the October air is a stark contrast to the soaring temperature of the campaign to save British food standards and prevent second-rate imports from decimating hard-won markets.

As Scottish farmers tidy up the last of a quality-assured cereals harvest, turn their attention to lifting tatties – produced to exacting standards – and prepare to oversee an autumn calving that meets strict QMS health and welfare conditions, Parliament will get a final say next week on the Agriculture Bill which, without the adoption of vital amendments, could undermine every guarantee British retailers and consumers have come to take for granted.

Farmers are rightly proud to produce food to some of the highest standards in the world but the conditions imposed by assurance bodies are onerous, expensive and mean costs need to be recouped in the market place.

It’s not a recipe for cheap food – but it is, without question, the right one, and should mean British farmers are well placed to export premium produce in future trade deals.

The Lords would appear to agree.

Their amendments to the Bill call for imported food to meet British standards and to give Parliament a final say over future trade deals.

They also call for the creation of a permanent independent food trade watchdog – an indication that they have as little faith in the temporary and toothless Trade and Agriculture Commission as the rest of us.

Meanwhile, Jamie Oliver, Hugh Fearnley-Whittingstall and a growing number of assorted other celebs have seen the light and are now leading the charge to persuade MPs to back the amendments.

Trade Secretary Liz Truss has accused the chefs of “jumping on the bandwagon”, but for the food and farming industry, which has been banging on about the potential consequences of cheap, substandard food imports for months, every influential voice is welcome – even if it has come at the eleventh hour.

I’m at a loss to understand how anyone – let alone an MP with a fragile toehold in a Scottish rural constituency – could vote against upholding food standards, but the government has apparently instructed Conservative members not to back the amendments – and they have the numbers.

So, if you do just one thing this weekend, make sure your MP knows the consequences – for them as well as Scotland’s agricultural industry – if they fail to respect the integrity and work of their farming constituents.

Welcome aboard the bandwagon.