Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

Serious questions raised over Liam Fee social workers

Liam Fee.
Liam Fee.

No timescale can be placed on the outcome of a signficiant case review into the death of a Fife toddler murdered by his mother and her partner, councillors have been told.

But serious question marks have again been raised about the state of Fife’s social work service prior to Liam Fee’s death, following a hearing last month which suggested the social work team responsible for the two-year-old was “dysfunctional” and was beset by “personality clashes”.

Evidence heard at a Scottish Social Services Council (SSSC) Conduct Sub-committee tribunal into Liam’s social worker Lesley Bate last month painted a picture of a “toxic atmosphere” within Fife Council’s Child Protection Team, amid accusations the team had been “split into two camps” in the lead up to Liam’s death at a house in Thornton in March 2014.

Those issues were highlighted at Thursday’s full Fife Council meeting by SNP Councillor Neale Hanvey, who pressed the local authority for a projected timescale of the independent significant case review and answers as to what actions are being considered as a result of the evidence presented by, and about, the council’s child protection social work service at Ms Bate’s tribunal.

In response, Independent Councillor Bryan Poole, spokesperson for education, children, young people and families, confirmed that there is no set timescale for when the review will be complete, and suggested the council was not in a position to comment on the allegations made during the SSSC hearing process.

However, Mr Hanvey has called for more clarity on the case — suggesting he had been given assurances by senior officers about the council’s role in Liam’s case before the bombshell accusations were heard in Ms Bate’s hearing.

“Was the dysfunctional nature of the team known about prior to the reassurances given to me in mid-August?” he questioned.

“If they were known about what was the rationale for withholding this information?

“Nothing should concern us more than the safety of the most vulnerable in our care, and if we are to protect the most vulnerable people we must have the courage to be honest.

“I would again ask what actions are being considered in light of the fact that staff made these comments in public and were thus reported?

“I would remind you that the alleged misconduct occurred between 2011 and 2014 and we all share a burden of responsibility to understand what went wrong and minimise risk.

“As I said that absolutely requires we have the courage to be honest with ourselves about the services we provide.”

Mr Poole said he felt it would be “unwise” to comment on the specific issues referred to about the child protection team at last month’s SSSC hearing, and said it was important to wait for the outcome of the case review.

“I think we need to wait until we get the result of that inquiry,” he added.

“I don’t think it’s correct to be speculating about staff competence in a public arena.”

The independent significant case review, chaired by eminent child protection expert Dr Jacqui Mok, is probing the circumstances leading up to Liam’s death was ordered after the murder convictions of Rachel Trelfa or Fee, 31, and her partner Nyomi Fee, 29.