Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

Bid to rescue wind farm plan after opposition from Gleneagles Hotel

Post Thumbnail

Developers have mounted a bid to rescue a highly controversial wind farm plan.

The nine-turbine project at Greenacres, between Comrie and Braco, was rejected by councillors in April.

More than 400 people and organisations, including the Gleneagles Hotel, had called for the scheme to be scrapped, arguing that it could hurt tourism and have a negative visual impact.

There were also concerns about an Ardoch Roman fort less than two miles from the turbines.

Now Green Cat Renewables has appealed to Scottish ministers, urging them to reverse the council’s decision.

In paperwork lodged with the government’s appeals division, the company argues that the nine-turbine scheme is more acceptable that a similar four-turbine plan for the same site which was refused in 2010.

A spokesman said: “A larger scheme would create a similar level of landscape and visual impact as the previous four-turbine proposal, while making a regionally significant renewable energy contribution.

“Unacceptable cumulative impact when considered alongside other schemes in the region has been addressed by having larger numbers of turbines in the layout.”

He added: “It is evident from many of the public representations, many of which used a standard proforma, that there has been a wide lack of appreciation of how a nine turbine development could be considered acceptable when a smaller scheme was previously considered unacceptable.

“The council have failed to demonstrate that any significant effects of more than local importance would warrant refusal, while the scheme would provide regionally significant renewable energy and socio-economic benefits.”

Green Cat said it was particularly disappointed that Gleneagles had objected.

In a letter to planners, an agent for the five-start establishment said: “We would stress that while impacts on the hotel and its operations at Gleneagles are paramount, our client recognises the impacts such developments have on the wider area and the overall tourism offer of Perthshire.

“It is the case that several visitors to the hotel have, in recent months, made comment regarding the proliferation of wind energy schemes within Perthshire and on their approach to the hotel.”

He said Gleneagles was generally supportive of renewable developments, but there were “serious concerns that the increasing numbers of wind energy schemes in the wider area is reaching saturation point.”

Councillors spoke out against the plan at a development management committee meeting in April.

Convener Tom Gray said he was “appalled” a second application had come forward for the same site.

Councillor Murray Lyle said applicants were attempting to “defend the indefensible”.

Ministers hope to give their ruling on the appeal by September.