Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

Online learning can benefit low ability schoolchildren more, according to research

Low ability pupils can benefit more from online learning, a study has found.

Children who are less academically able have been found to make better progress through online and blended learning – providing they have IT access.

A study found that those deemed of ‘low ability’ made the biggest achievement gains when using computers, laptops or other devices to learn.

It also showed that girls performed better than boys using this type of teaching.

A review of research led by Dundee University looked at online and blended learning as schools were closed during lockdown and pupils taught using assignments issued online.

Digital divide

One of the biggest concerns about learning during lockdown was a digital divide between those with access to technology and those without, exacerbating the poverty-related attainment gap.

But Professor Keith Topping, of the university’s school of education and social work, said: “Disadvantaged and rural students show positive results where access to digital technology is made readily available.

“Low ability children were found in several studies to respond to digital technology more favourably than average children.

“There was also a number of positive studies of digital technology for children in the early years or at nursery or playgroup, as well as those with very various special needs, such as autism or Down’s syndrome.

Professor Keith Topping.

“A wide range of students from ethnic minorities also show promising results.”

Professor Topping recommended schools pursue such teaching methods post-pandemic rather than reverting to traditional forms.

He said: “This review is particularly relevant at a time when schools have been forced by the Covid-19 pandemic to implement some of these measures due to pupils being unable to attend in person.

“The past six months have been hugely disruptive for the education of children but it would be a mistake to pivot back to the status quo without pausing to consider what benefits online and blended learning can bring in the long run.”

It would be a mistake to pivot back to the status quo without pausing to consider what benefits online and blended learning can bring in the long run.”

Professor Keith Topping

The review found that most studies in the field found blended and online learning better than traditional instruction and that educational games and computer-assisted instruction (CAI) were very effective.

They had positive effects on performance when compared to traditional classroom teaching at both primary and secondary schools.

Science and maths were the most popular subjects, but there were positive results in a wide range of other subjects, including reading and writing, critical thinking, art and music, and health.

Of 1,540 studies analysed from all over the world, 72% found some form of digital technology performed better than traditional instruction.