Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

Survivor of horrific abuse at Fife residential school claims victims will suffer under new financial redress legislation

Dave Sharp.
Dave Sharp.

A man who was brutally abused by priests at a Fife residential school has blasted the Scottish Government’s plans to compensate victims.

The Redress for Survivors (Historical Child Abuse in Care) (Scotland) Bill was introduced last week and if passed in Parliament, would allow victims to apply for payments of up to £80,000.

As a child, Dave Sharp, 61, was repeatedly beaten and raped by members of the Congregation of Christian Brothers at the former St Ninian’s School in Falkland.

He claims the legislation would protect the Catholic church from making compensation payments, while discouraging survivors to come forward.

“The Catholic church are going to save millions if this bill is allowed to go through and many hundreds, even thousands, of survivors who were abused in Scotland are going to suffer.

“The Bill states that applicants will have to provide documentary information to satisfy the decision-making panel. How many survivors do we know who can access their records? This alone is a dangerous position to put survivors in.”

Mr Sharp, who struggled with drug addiction for more than two decades as a result of the trauma he suffered and now campaigns for justice for survivors, also criticised the waiver applicants would have to sign.

It would prevent them taking civil action against the Scottish Government and organisations that have made financial contributions to the scheme.

Survivors who had received payments such as court-awarded damages would have the total they were paid deducted from the amount offered.

He said: “What is going to happen to the thousands of men and woman who received pittances from the Catholic church and were made to sign waivers?”

Three years ago, after a 40 year fight for justice, Mr Sharp was awarded a five-figure sum after seeking compensation through an English court because at the time in Scotland, there was still a time bar of three years.

He said: “When we look at the financial contributions it looks like we are not only losing out on payments due from the Scottish Government but this money could be deducted from any contributions made by the Catholic church.”

A Scottish Government spokesperson said: “We have taken a number of steps to support survivors of historical child abuse in care over recent years.

“We have been guided by our close engagement with survivors throughout to ensure services and support are tailored to their needs and as accessible as possible. This includes consulting on the Bill introduced last week for a financial redress scheme.

“The independent public inquiry we established into the abuse of children in care is one of the most wide-ranging in Scotland’s history and we have removed the long-standing time-bar which prevented most survivors from pursuing civil damages actions for child abuse.

“The redress scheme we introduced gives survivors an option for financial payment that would not be open to many of them through the courts otherwise.

“Many survivors have campaigned for a long time for these changes and we are grateful for their continued involvement in helping us address the wrongs of the past and provide meaningful redress and support.”