Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

Controversy as council unveils plans to build luxury homes

Raith Gates care home will be demolished to make way for a children's home
Raith Gates care home will be demolished to make way for a children's home

Fife Council has announced controversial plans to build five luxury homes to sell on the open market.

The £300,000 four and five-bedroom houses would be built next to a planned children’s home in an upmarket area of Kirkcaldy.

The Labour council is thought to have earmarked around £1 million for the scheme, which could be a first in Scotland.

Officers say building the houses next to the residential home at Raith Gates would make the looked-after children less obvious in the community after a number of residents campaigned against having them there.

It would also mean the youngsters would not have to endure building work on the site if it was later sold to a private developer.

But the proposal, which could leave the council open to legal action, has caused outrage among opponents who claim it is not the local authority’s place to build private, luxury houses.

There are also concerns it has learned nothing from the Madras College saga which resulted in a lengthy and expensive legal battle.

The council’s head of assets, Ken Gourlay, said the law normally prevented local authorities from building houses for sale at a profit.

It would be allowed under special powers, however, if it could be shown it would benefit the community.

In this case, he said, it would ensure the social and mental health of the vulnerable children living in the home.

He added that while a legal challenge was possible, the risk was low.

Mr Gourlay said there was no intention to make a profit and added: “In these particular circumstances the sale of the houses is not considered to constitute a trading operation.”

SNP councillor Neale Hanvey has criticised the move, claiming there had been no consultation and no consideration of previously identified options.

“There is no detail on who was consulted in the development of the paper, not least the care-experienced young people, who are our greatest resource in ensuring we get such things right,” he said.

“On top of this apparent disregard for the young people, I am sure I am not the only one asking with no small sense of bewilderment, since when did the council become a developer of luxury homes?”