Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

Fife ‘prairie’ farmer’s actions investigated under environmental legislation

Pitlochie Farm
Pitlochie Farm

A Fife farmer who removed six miles of drystane dykes from his land is being investigated under environmental legislation.

James Orr was stripped of most of his taxpayer-funded support payment in June, after demolishing the dykes at Pitlochie Farm at Gateside, creating a “prairie”.

The 75% penalty, applied to any support scheme payments Pitlochie Farming Company will receive this year, is the highest ever imposed for a breach of the conditions attached to the scheme.

It is not clear what that amounted to in monetary terms but official UK Government figures show the firm received £103,795 in direct aid in 2018.

North East Fife Liberal Democrat MSP Willie Rennie criticised the punishment as “little more than a slap on the wrist” as Mr Orr cannot be forced to rebuild the walls under the rules of the EU-governed payments.

Dating back to the early 1800s, the walls were regarded as a haven for wildlife while protecting local communities from flooding.

Fergus Ewing, Scotland’s cabinet secretary for rural economy, has now confirmed the removal of field boundaries is covered by Environmental Impact Assessment Regulations.

“My officials are currently assessing the implications of the dyke removal at Pitlochie Farm under those regulations,” he said.

Mr Ewing added: “With the current pressure on farm gate prices, a penalty of this scale would represent a very significant reduction in the total farm income of any agricultural business and therefore I don’t agree that the penalty is insufficient to deter others from carrying out similar action.”

Mr Rennie said he welcomed the investigation.

“Although I am disappointed that the government doesn’t feel it appropriate to fine Mr Orr more than 75% of his farm payment, I am pleased that he is being investigated under the Environmental Impact Assessment Regulations.

“Whatever his justification for the removal of the walls, it was a flagrant disregard for the rules which every farmer works hard to comply with.

“It’s also had a significant impact on the biodiversity and the local landscape.

“The government must explore every avenue of the law to make sure this is never repeated.”

Mr Orr has declined to comment on the issue but in his defence, a neighbouring farmer said: “I think he has done an excellent job in making the farm more efficient.

“The stones from the dykes have been made into roads on the farm so he doesn’t have to take his tractors on to the main road. That’s a big plus for motorists.”