Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

Concern over battlefield site earmarked for £140m Perth West development

A re-enactment of the Marquis of Montrose 1640's campaign.
A re-enactment of the Marquis of Montrose 1640's campaign.

Historians are worried that a massive development planned for Perth could wipe out unrecorded evidence of one of Scotland’s most significant conflicts.

The Battle of Tippermuir marked the first shots fired in the 17th Century Scottish Civil War.

It was the start of the Marquis of Montrose’s campaign for Charles I against the Covenanter armies of the Scottish Parliament.

The battle happened on an area of flat ground between Perth and the village of Tippermuir, now Tibbermore.

But the land is now earmarked as part of the £140 million Perth West project, the city’s biggest ever infrastructure scheme.

The expansion is expected to include around 3,700 houses and new businesses. The land, off the A9, has been unlocked thanks to £35m of roadworks, including the new A9/A85 junction.

The First Marquis of Montrose Society has now called for measures to fully research the land, before any development work begins.

The group was founded in 1995 to highlight the exploits of First Marquis James Graham, who led his troops to victory at Tippermuir.

In its submission to Perth and Kinross Council planners, as part of the Local Development Plan consultation, the society stops short of making a formal objection, but calls for a “constructive approach towards balancing battlefield development and sustainable development.”

Society spokesman Lieutenant Colonel Malcolm McVittie said: “It is vital that a battlefield conservation plan is prepared as a precursor to any masterplan being prepared, or planning application submitted.”

He added: “Before any development plan can be formed or accepted, further historical and archaeological research must be conducted to examine the possible deployment options and confirm the extent of the battlefield to be preserved.

“At present, there is no evidence of any archaeological research having been done specifically to locate and define the battlefield area.”

Mr McVittie also called for an up-to-date review of all evidence, to produce an agreed position on where the armies stood.

Interpretation boards could be used to highlight historic hotspots to visitors, once the battlefield has been mapped out.

In a report to councillors, a spokesman for the local authority’s planning office said site developers would be required to produce a  Battlefield Conservation Plan.

“This provides a suitable context for any future masterplanning and planning
applications and ensures the heritage interests can inform the layout and
open spaces,” he said.

“The battle is relatively unknown to the general public, however,
the preparation of a Battlefield Conservation Plan affords the opportunity to
increase public awareness and potentially provide interpretive material.”